Re: Re: latest 3.14.0-rc8+ : "INFO: inconsistent lock state "

Re: Re: latest 3.14.0-rc8+ : "INFO: inconsistent lock state "

[Jongman Heo]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr, Size: 2684 bytes --]


>
>
>------- Original Message -------
>
>Sender : Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
>
>Date : 2014-03-29 13:23 (GMT+09:00)
>
>Title : Re: latest 3.14.0-rc8+ : "INFO: inconsistent lock state "
>
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Jongman Heo wrote:
>>
>> Hi, guys,
>>
>> With today's linus git tree, I got following messages;
>>
>> [   97.426196] =================================
>> [   97.426198] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
>> [   97.426221] 3.14.0-rc8+ #45 Tainted: G        W
>> [   97.426224] ---------------------------------
>> [   97.426227] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
>> [   97.426229] kworker/7:1/101 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
>> [   97.426231]  (&addrconf_stats->syncp.seq){+.?...}, at: [] mld_send_initial_cr.part.30+0x81/0xa0
>> [   97.426255] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
>> [   97.426258]   [] __lock_acquire+0x414/0x18e0
>> [   97.426265]   [] lock_acquire+0x98/0x120
>> [   97.426268]   [] mld_sendpack+0xdf/0x5b0
>> [   97.426270]   [] mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x191/0x2c0
>> [   97.426272]   [] call_timer_fn+0x75/0x160
>> [   97.426276]   [] run_timer_softirq+0x192/0x230
>> [   97.426281]   [] __do_softirq+0xfb/0x2b0
>> [   97.426286] irq event stamp: 33365
>> [   97.426289] hardirqs last  enabled at (33365): [] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6b/0xc0
>> [   97.426292] hardirqs last disabled at (33363): [] __do_softirq+0x145/0x2b0
>> [   97.426294] softirqs last  enabled at (33364): [] __do_softirq+0x1a4/0x2b0
>> [   97.426297] softirqs last disabled at (33341): [] do_softirq_own_stack+0x35/0x40
>> [   97.426303]
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>> [   97.426305]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>
>> [   97.426306]        CPU0
>> [   97.426307]        ----
>> [   97.426308]   lock(&addrconf_stats->syncp.seq);
>> [   97.426310]   
>> [   97.426311]     lock(&addrconf_stats->syncp.seq);
>> [   97.426313]
>>  *** DEADLOCK ***
>
>Does the following patch help?
>
>diff --git a/net/ipv6/mcast.c b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
>index e1e4735..74a774a 100644
>--- a/net/ipv6/mcast.c
>+++ b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
>@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ static void mld_sendpack(struct sk_buff *skb)
>
>        rcu_read_lock();
>        idev = __in6_dev_get(skb->dev);
>-       IP6_UPD_PO_STATS(net, idev, IPSTATS_MIB_OUT, skb->len);
>+       IP6_UPD_PO_STATS_BH(net, idev, IPSTATS_MIB_OUT, skb->len);
>
>        payload_len = (skb_tail_pointer(skb) - skb_network_header(skb)) -
>                sizeof(*pip6);
>
>
>

Hi,

No, it doesn't fix the issue.

Regards,
Jongman Heo.ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥