public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: bd71828: add input current limit property
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:33:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95c60933-8a78-4908-bc51-d4bd5a3f10de@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415221358.59574987@kemnade.info>

On 15/04/2026 23:13, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2026 09:33:25 +0300
> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I am afraid I don't know your use-case for the control of the DCIN input
>> limit well enough to decide, if the BD72720 would need something similar
>> - or if the VBUS_INLIM should be tied to the same knob. If you have the
>> enthusiasm to write some more words ... I am keen on learning! :)
> 
> Justification for this patch is mostly: there is a standard interface
> for this functionality and the chip has that functionality.

I wasn't doubting the justification for this patch. I was more like 
wondering if the use-case of the functionality, toggled by the 
interface, is such that BD72720 VBUS_INLIM should be tied to this same knob.

> The bigger picture: Attach a power source with changing properties causes
> mess. To repreduce issues at my desk, I have played around with a labor power
> supply with changeable current limitation, turining it down to zero (so
> power is off) then turning it on slowly again, no charging will happen. My
> usual way around such a problem is to clear DCIN_ILIM_EN (will add a sysfs
> attribute for that) and set some conservative current.

Right. I suppose deciding if the BD72720 should support changing the 
VBUS_INLIM would require me to have the hardware to do some testing so I 
could see how it behaves with variable charging currents. I don't 
currently have that, and I haven't heard of any complaints. Furthermore, 
AFAIR, there are some differences between the logic of BD71828 and 
BD72720 (battery assisted mode in BD72720) - so they're not 100% same. 
Hence, I won't touch the BD72720 for now.

Thanks for sharing the details!

Yours,
	-- Matti

-- 
---
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-17  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-01 21:17 [PATCH] power: supply: bd71828: add input current limit property Andreas Kemnade
2026-04-02 22:54 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-04-07  5:34 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-04-07  5:48   ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-04-07  6:33 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-04-15 20:13   ` Andreas Kemnade
2026-04-17  7:33     ` Matti Vaittinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95c60933-8a78-4908-bc51-d4bd5a3f10de@gmail.com \
    --to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox