From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: christian.loehle@arm.com, tj@kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org,
len.brown@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 08/10] PM: EM: Implement em_notify_pd_deleted()
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 11:17:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c07dd28-e40d-4212-8b26-2909e0179ab0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250921031928.205869-9-changwoo@igalia.com>
On 9/21/25 04:19, Changwoo Min wrote:
> Add the event notification infrastructure and implement the event
> notification for when a performance domain is deleted (EM_CMD_PD_DELETED).
>
> The event contains the ID of the performance domain (EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID)
> so the userspace can identify the changed performance domain for further
> processing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
> ---
> kernel/power/em_netlink.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/power/em_netlink.h | 18 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/em_netlink.c b/kernel/power/em_netlink.c
> index 59953cfedf78..ff6aa848d998 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/em_netlink.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/em_netlink.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,62 @@ int em_nl_get_pd_table_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +
> +/**************************** Event encoding *********************************/
> +int em_notify_pd_created(const struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +int em_notify_pd_updated(const struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
Those two functions doesn't belong to this patch $subject.
I would recommend adding them in the following patch where they
are properly defined.
> +
> +static int __em_notify_pd_deleted_size(const struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> +{
> + int id_sz = nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)); /* EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID */
> +
> + return nlmsg_total_size(genlmsg_msg_size(id_sz));
> +}
> +
> +int em_notify_pd_deleted(const struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *msg;
> + int ret = -EMSGSIZE;
> + void *hdr;
> + int msg_sz;
> +
> + if (!genl_has_listeners(&em_nl_family, &init_net, EM_NLGRP_EVENT))
> + return 0;
> +
> + msg_sz = __em_notify_pd_deleted_size(pd);
> +
> + msg = genlmsg_new(msg_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, 0, 0, &em_nl_family, 0, EM_CMD_PD_DELETED);
> + if (!hdr)
> + goto out_free_msg;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, EM_A_PD_TABLE_PD_ID, pd->id)) {
> + ret = -EMSGSIZE;
> + goto out_free_msg;
> + }
> +
> + genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
> +
> + genlmsg_multicast(&em_nl_family, msg, 0, EM_NLGRP_EVENT, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out_free_msg:
> + nlmsg_free(msg);
> + return ret;
> +}
It looks like we don't handle the error outputs of those
em_notify_* function (based on last patch in the set.
Can we just simply change the function to void?
It would also avoid some spurious static analysis tools checking the
code in future.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-21 3:19 [PATCH RESEND v4 00/10] PM: EM: Add netlink support for the energy model Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 01/10] PM: EM: Assign a unique ID when creating a performance domain Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 8:17 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-06 12:24 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-13 13:46 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 02/10] PM: EM: Expose the ID of a performance domain via debugfs Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 14:26 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 03/10] PM: EM: Add an iterator and accessor for the performance domain Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 15:14 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 04/10] PM: EM: Add em.yaml and autogen files Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 15:25 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 05/10] PM: EM: Add a skeleton code for netlink notification Changwoo Min
2025-10-06 15:44 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-13 13:46 ` Changwoo Min
2025-10-13 13:53 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-13 14:43 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 06/10] PM: EM: Implement em_nl_get_pds_doit() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 9:32 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 07/10] PM: EM: Implement em_nl_get_pd_table_doit() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:01 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-13 13:47 ` Changwoo Min
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 08/10] PM: EM: Implement em_notify_pd_deleted() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:17 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 09/10] PM: EM: Implement em_notify_pd_created/updated() Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:19 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-09-21 3:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 10/10] PM: EM: Notify an event when the performance domain changes Changwoo Min
2025-10-10 10:20 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c07dd28-e40d-4212-8b26-2909e0179ab0@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox