Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] coresight: Separate failure and success flows

[Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>]

On 12/05/2025 16:41, Leo Yan wrote:
> For a success registration, it releases mutex, then binds associated CTI
> device, and returns a device pointer.
> 
> As a result, it separates flows between the success case and the failure
> flow, any code after the tag 'out_unlock' is only used for failure
> handling.
> 

This description is a bit ambiguous. Please could we simply say:

Subject: coresight: Cleanup coresight_register error handling

Separate the failure handling path from the successful case.
Use the out_unlock label only for the failure handling.

Rest looks fine to me.

Suzuki

> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> ---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> index 4f51ce152ac7..4fc82206b326 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> @@ -1377,17 +1377,21 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
>   	registered = true;
>   
>   	ret = coresight_create_conns_sysfs_group(csdev);
> -	if (!ret)
> -		ret = coresight_fixup_orphan_conns(csdev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +
> +	ret = coresight_fixup_orphan_conns(csdev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&coresight_mutex);
> +
> +	if (cti_assoc_ops && cti_assoc_ops->add)
> +		cti_assoc_ops->add(csdev);
> +	return csdev;
>   
>   out_unlock:
>   	mutex_unlock(&coresight_mutex);
> -	/* Success */
> -	if (!ret) {
> -		if (cti_assoc_ops && cti_assoc_ops->add)
> -			cti_assoc_ops->add(csdev);
> -		return csdev;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* Unregister the device if needed */
>   	if (registered) {