From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <soc@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: make TPS6594 support build-in
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:02:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DEE91R7LQ6X5.2TJ5HTFJVC7O@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c55c87ea-01a1-4200-8fed-e629d7d068ec@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1230 bytes --]
On Fri Nov 21, 2025 at 9:10 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/11/2025 08:42, Michael Walle wrote:
>> On Thu Nov 20, 2025 at 2:51 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/11/2025 08:55, Michael Walle wrote:
>>>> The Kontron SMARC-sAM67 module needs the TPS6594 regulator driver to
>>>> boot from SD card, i.e. for its root filesystem.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Arnd, the PR from TI [1] (which contains the device trees for this
>>>> board) is already out, so I'm sending this to the soc ML directly.
>>>> Let me know if this can still be applied, if not, I'll have to wait
>>>> for the next window.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why it cannot go via TI tree? It should...
>>
>> As explained above it can of course, but I've missed the time window
>> as the PR from the TI tree to the soc tree was already sent out.
>
> This alone would justify for anyone to send directly to soc@ when they
> miss their upstream maintainer timeframes, so sorry, but that's the way.
Fair point. Sorry for the noise.
-michael
> Time window in TI can still take it. If they cannot, then for sure soc@
> cannot, because soc@ takes from TI.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 297 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-21 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 7:55 [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: make TPS6594 support build-in Michael Walle
2025-11-20 13:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-21 7:42 ` Michael Walle
2025-11-21 8:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-21 9:02 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2025-11-21 8:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DEE91R7LQ6X5.2TJ5HTFJVC7O@kernel.org \
--to=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox