The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
@ 2026-05-23 18:34 Suchit Karunakaran
  2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
  2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Suchit Karunakaran @ 2026-05-23 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau, memxor, song,
	yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
  Cc: linux-kernel, Suchit Karunakaran

Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
preserving correctness.

Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
index 1a3233a275c7..3b05ac1d7c77 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
@@ -197,17 +197,13 @@ static bool
 fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 {
 	struct bpf_list_node *node;
+	bool empty;
 
 	bpf_spin_lock(lock);
-	node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
-	if (node) {
-		bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
-		bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
-		return false;
-	}
+	empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
 	bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
 
-	return true;
+	return empty;
 }
 
 /* flow->age is used to denote the state of the flow (not-detached, detached, throttled)
-- 
2.54.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
  2026-05-23 18:34 [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
@ 2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
  2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bot+bpf-ci @ 2026-05-23 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: suchitkarunakaran, andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau,
	memxor, song, yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
  Cc: linux-kernel, suchitkarunakaran, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau,
	eddyz87, yonghong.song, clm, ihor.solodrai

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1148 bytes --]

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> index 1a3233a275c7..3b05ac1d7c77 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> @@ -197,17 +197,13 @@ static bool
>  fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_list_node *node;
                              ^^^^

The variable 'node' is no longer used after removing the pop/push logic.
Will this trigger an unused-variable compiler warning and break the selftests
build?

>  +	bool empty;
>
>  	bpf_spin_lock(lock);
> -	node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
> -	if (node) {
> -		bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
> -		bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
> -		return false;
> -	}
> +	empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
>  	bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
>
> -	return true;
> +	return empty;
>  }


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/26340856238

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
  2026-05-23 18:34 [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
  2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
@ 2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Emil Tsalapatis @ 2026-05-25 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suchit Karunakaran, andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau,
	memxor, song, yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
  Cc: linux-kernel

On Sat May 23, 2026 at 2:34 PM EDT, Suchit Karunakaran wrote:
> Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
> check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
> This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
> preserving correctness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>

Imo the new code is way nicer, so even if this is a selftest the change
is worth it. After addressing the AI feedback feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> index 1a3233a275c7..3b05ac1d7c77 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> @@ -197,17 +197,13 @@ static bool
>  fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_list_node *node;
> +	bool empty;
>  
>  	bpf_spin_lock(lock);
> -	node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
> -	if (node) {
> -		bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
> -		bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
> -		return false;
> -	}
> +	empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
>  	bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
>  
> -	return true;
> +	return empty;
>  }
>  
>  /* flow->age is used to denote the state of the flow (not-detached, detached, throttled)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-25 18:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-23 18:34 [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox