* [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
@ 2026-05-23 18:34 Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Suchit Karunakaran @ 2026-05-23 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau, memxor, song,
yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
Cc: linux-kernel, Suchit Karunakaran
Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
preserving correctness.
Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
index 1a3233a275c7..3b05ac1d7c77 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
@@ -197,17 +197,13 @@ static bool
fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
{
struct bpf_list_node *node;
+ bool empty;
bpf_spin_lock(lock);
- node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
- if (node) {
- bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
- bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
- return false;
- }
+ empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
- return true;
+ return empty;
}
/* flow->age is used to denote the state of the flow (not-detached, detached, throttled)
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
2026-05-23 18:34 [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
@ 2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bot+bpf-ci @ 2026-05-23 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: suchitkarunakaran, andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau,
memxor, song, yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
Cc: linux-kernel, suchitkarunakaran, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau,
eddyz87, yonghong.song, clm, ihor.solodrai
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1148 bytes --]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> index 1a3233a275c7..3b05ac1d7c77 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> @@ -197,17 +197,13 @@ static bool
> fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
> {
> struct bpf_list_node *node;
^^^^
The variable 'node' is no longer used after removing the pop/push logic.
Will this trigger an unused-variable compiler warning and break the selftests
build?
> + bool empty;
>
> bpf_spin_lock(lock);
> - node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
> - if (node) {
> - bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
> - bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
> - return false;
> - }
> + empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
> bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
>
> - return true;
> + return empty;
> }
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/26340856238
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
2026-05-23 18:34 [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
@ 2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Emil Tsalapatis @ 2026-05-25 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suchit Karunakaran, andrii, eddyz87, ast, daniel, martin.lau,
memxor, song, yonghong.song, shuah, bpf, linux-kselftest
Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat May 23, 2026 at 2:34 PM EDT, Suchit Karunakaran wrote:
> Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
> check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
> This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
> preserving correctness.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
Imo the new code is way nicer, so even if this is a selftest the change
is worth it. After addressing the AI feedback feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> index 1a3233a275c7..3b05ac1d7c77 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
> @@ -197,17 +197,13 @@ static bool
> fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
> {
> struct bpf_list_node *node;
> + bool empty;
>
> bpf_spin_lock(lock);
> - node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
> - if (node) {
> - bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
> - bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
> - return false;
> - }
> + empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
> bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
>
> - return true;
> + return empty;
> }
>
> /* flow->age is used to denote the state of the flow (not-detached, detached, throttled)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-25 18:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-23 18:34 [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() Suchit Karunakaran
2026-05-23 19:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox