From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: double-standard? (Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:49:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16zOGm-0001Lz-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204221315430.14415-100000@twinlark.arctic.org>
On Monday 22 April 2002 22:37, dean gaudet wrote:
> i happen to put food on my table working at a hardware company; larry puts
> food on his working at a software company. i happen to work at the same
> hardware company as linus does: transmeta. every kernel for the past,
> uh, 6 or 7 years, has included an advertisement for transmeta. could we
> possibly conceive of removing all references to transmeta from the kernel,
> mailing lists and archives?
How big is the Transmeta ad? Does it have its own file? Would you be
satisfied if Bitkeeper had the same size advertisement as Transmeta?
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-22 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020421101731.D10525@work.bitmover.com>
2002-04-21 17:22 ` [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Jeff Garzik
2002-04-20 17:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-21 17:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-20 18:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-20 18:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-21 18:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-20 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-21 18:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-21 18:21 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-20 18:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-21 18:36 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-20 18:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-21 19:07 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-21 14:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-21 18:38 ` yodaiken
2002-04-21 18:08 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-20 18:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-21 19:06 ` dean gaudet
2002-04-21 14:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22 17:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-21 17:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22 17:30 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-21 17:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22 17:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-21 17:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-21 20:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22 22:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-22 22:17 ` There is no cabal (was: the BK flamewar) Jeff Garzik
2002-04-22 23:22 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-22 23:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-04-22 20:37 ` double-standard? (Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree) dean gaudet
2002-04-21 20:49 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-04-21 20:22 ` [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Andrew Morton
2002-04-22 0:01 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-22 20:32 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E16zOGm-0001Lz-00@starship \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org \
--cc=garzik@havoc.gtf.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox