From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz, kees@kernel.org,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.wrona@samsung.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] iio: ssp_sensors: reuse embedded RX buffer for SPI transfers
Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 20:32:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F00A45E4-EB46-4D55-B533-E2BD329A0513@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260426153154.11bb41c9@jic23-huawei>
On 26 April 2026 8:01:54 pm IST, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:47:10 +0530
>Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
>>
>> Avoid allocating a temporary DMA buffer in the interrupt context when
>> handling hub-to-AP and AP-to-hub SPI write messages.
>>
>> Replace the dynamically allocated RX buffer with a fixed-size,
>> preallocated buffer embedded in the driver structure and reused for all
>> SPI receive operations. This removes memory allocation from the
>> IRQ path, simplifies lifetime management.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v6:
>> - Replace dynamically allocated RX buffer with embedded fixed-size buffer
>> - Fix struct layout to satisfy DMA alignment constraints comment from David
>> - v5 change: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260406080852.2727453-6-sanjayembedded@gmail.com/
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Rebase change on top of latest v5 patch series.
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Use preallocated buffer and stash a buffer that gets reused each time instead of a fresh allocation.
>> - v3 change: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260315125509.857195-3-sanjayembedded@gmail.com/
>> Changes in v3:
>> - prepare series to have all respective cleanup API support for the ssp_sensors following input from Andy Shevchenko
>> - v2 change: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260311174151.3441429-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com/
>> Changes in v2:
>> - split series to individual patch
>> - address review comment from Andy Shevchenko
>> - v1 change: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260310200513.2162018-3-sanjayembedded@gmail.com/
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c | 20 ++------------------
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp.h b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp.h
>> index f649cdecc277..8295bb7062a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp.h
>> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ struct ssp_sensorhub_info {
>> * @pending_list: pending list for messages queued to be sent/read
>> * @sensor_devs: registered IIO devices table
>> * @enable_refcount: enable reference count for wdt (watchdog timer)
>> + * @rx_buf: buffer to receive SPI data
>> * @header_buffer: cache aligned buffer for packet header
>> */
>> struct ssp_data {
>> @@ -221,6 +222,8 @@ struct ssp_data {
>> struct iio_dev *sensor_devs[SSP_SENSOR_MAX];
>> atomic_t enable_refcount;
>>
>> + u8 rx_buf[SSP_DATA_PACKET_SIZE];
>
>Whilst the define exists for this size, do we have anything to confirm it is right?
>It wasn't previously used for anything so is a bit high risk.
>
Nothing specific to confirm, I'm assuming this macro and value is added during development so must be specificing as per technical or reference manual for the SSP firmware protocol.
Although, we can plan to add check as pre-change like below:
if (length -> sizeof(data->rx_buf)
return -EINVAL;
>Also, why doesn't it need to be DMA safe? I'd expect it either after the following buffer
>or with a __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN) marking in which case the one below isn't used.
>
I will make it
u8 rx_buf[SSP_DATA_PACKET_SIZE] __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
>
>> +
>> __le16 header_buffer[SSP_HEADER_BUFFER_SIZE / sizeof(__le16)] __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
>> index 870214551f0b..e41da88bf96d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
>> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int ssp_parse_dataframe(struct ssp_data *data, char *dataframe, int len)
>> /* threaded irq */
>> int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
>> {
>> - char *buffer;
>> + char *buffer = data->rx_buf;
>
>Put this in inline. The local variable may reduce code churn but
>it also hides the important info that this is not locally allocated.
>
Agree, will update.
>> u8 msg_type;
>> int ret;
>> u16 length, msg_options;
>> @@ -383,19 +383,12 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
>> * but the slave should not send such ones - it is to
>> * check but let's handle this
>> */
>> - buffer = kmalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
>> - if (!buffer) {
>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto _unlock;
>> - }
>>
>> /* got dead packet so it is always an error */
>> ret = spi_read(data->spi, buffer, length);
>> if (ret >= 0)
>> ret = -EPROTO;
>>
>> - kfree(buffer);
>> -
>> dev_err(SSP_DEV, "No match error %x\n",
>> msg_options);
>>
>> @@ -428,22 +421,13 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
>> mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
>> break;
>> case SSP_HUB2AP_WRITE:
>> - buffer = kzalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
>> - if (!buffer)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>> ret = spi_read(data->spi, buffer, length);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(SSP_DEV, "spi read fail\n");
>> - kfree(buffer);
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = ssp_parse_dataframe(data, buffer, length);
>> -
>> - kfree(buffer);
>> - break;
>> -
>> + return ssp_parse_dataframe(data, buffer, length);
>
>This now makes this path different from the other switch legs.
>I would precede this patch with one doing direct returns from
>all the legs in here. Then this just becomes an obvious update
>in this patch.
>
I will precede a patch to update all the legs in switch.
>> default:
>> dev_err(SSP_DEV, "unknown msg type\n");
>> return -EPROTO;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-26 9:17 [PATCH v7 0/9] iio: ssp_sensors: improve resource cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle warning Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 13:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-29 18:12 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helper(s) Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 14:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-27 8:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-03 11:23 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-05 16:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-06 7:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iio: ssp_sensors: cancel delayed work_refresh on remove Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 14:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-29 18:06 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-29 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out mcu enable/disable helper(s) Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 14:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iio: ssp_sensors: use local struct device Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 14:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-27 8:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-03 12:06 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iio: ssp_sensors: Drop duplicated wdt timer and work cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-27 8:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-03 13:06 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iio: ssp_sensors: convert probe and teardown to devm-managed resources Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iio: ssp_sensors: Use dev_err_probe Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 14:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-27 8:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-27 8:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-26 9:17 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iio: ssp_sensors: reuse embedded RX buffer for SPI transfers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-04-26 14:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-03 15:02 ` Sanjay Chitroda [this message]
2026-04-26 14:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-03 14:17 ` Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-04 8:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F00A45E4-EB46-4D55-B533-E2BD329A0513@gmail.com \
--to=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=k.wrona@samsung.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox