* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-02-20 19:05 ` Pavel Machek
2023-02-21 8:03 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-02-20 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-20 19:05 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-02-21 8:03 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-02-21 14:20 ` Jon Hunter
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-02-21 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 19:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.169-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.169-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 7d11e4c4fc56eb25c5b41da93748dbcf21956316
* git describe: v5.10.168-58-g7d11e4c4fc56
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.168-58-g7d11e4c4fc56
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.168)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.168)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.168)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.168)
## Test result summary
total: 156525, pass: 130423, fail: 3439, skip: 22346, xfail: 317
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 149 total, 148 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 46 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 39 total, 37 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 25 passed, 7 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 11 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-20 19:05 ` Pavel Machek
2023-02-21 8:03 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-02-21 14:20 ` Jon Hunter
2023-02-21 14:58 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-02-21 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:36:08 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.169-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.169-rc1-g7d11e4c4fc56
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-21 14:20 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2023-02-21 14:58 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2023-02-21 16:21 ` Guenter Roeck
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2023-02-21 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:36:08PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2906
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2909
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-21 14:58 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2023-02-21 16:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-21 19:54 ` Florian Fainelli
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-02-21 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:36:08PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 478 pass: 478 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-21 16:21 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-02-21 19:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-21 23:50 ` Shuah Khan
2023-02-22 8:44 ` zhouzhixiu
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-02-21 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 2/20/23 05:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.169-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-21 19:54 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-02-21 23:50 ` Shuah Khan
2023-02-22 8:44 ` zhouzhixiu
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-02-21 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 2/20/23 06:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.169-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review
2023-02-20 13:36 [PATCH 5.10 00/57] 5.10.169-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-21 23:50 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-02-22 8:44 ` zhouzhixiu
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: zhouzhixiu @ 2023-02-22 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 2023/2/20 21:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.169 release.
> There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:35:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.169-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
Tested on arm64 and x86 for 5.10.169-rc1,
Kernel
repo:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Version: 5.10.169-rc1
Commit: 7d11e4c4fc56eb25c5b41da93748dbcf21956316
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
x86:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total: 9023
passed: 9023
failed: 0
timeout: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot@huawei.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread