* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-01-03 0:28 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-03 1:13 ` Guenter Roeck
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-01-03 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 1/2/23 04:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-03 0:28 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-01-03 1:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-03 8:33 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-01-03 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 500 pass: 500 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-03 0:28 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-03 1:13 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-03 8:33 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-03 10:37 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-03 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 16:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.0.17-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-6.0.y
* git commit: 9c0ac88985a8f62726941213c92ff8eddf500f72
* git describe: v6.0.16-75-g9c0ac88985a8
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.0.y/build/v6.0.16-75-g9c0ac88985a8
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.0.15-1067-gf54b936f8ec7)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.0.15-1067-gf54b936f8ec7)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.0.15-1067-gf54b936f8ec7)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.0.15-1067-gf54b936f8ec7)
## Test result summary
total: 143234, pass: 127347, fail: 2737, skip: 12854, xfail: 296
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 146 passed, 5 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 49 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 39 total, 36 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 30 total, 28 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 32 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 41 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-03 8:33 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-03 10:37 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2023-01-03 22:59 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2023-01-03 12:07 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2023-01-03 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221127):
mips: 52 configs -> no failure
arm: 100 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. VNC server did not start, will try a bisect
later tonight.
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2541
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2545
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-03 10:37 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2023-01-03 22:59 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2023-01-04 11:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2023-01-03 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, David S. Miller
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 10:37, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
<sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
<snip>
>
> mips: Booted on ci20 board. VNC server did not start, will try a bisect
> later tonight.
bisect pointed to 2575eebf1bd2 ("net: Return errno in
sk->sk_prot->get_port().") introduced in v6.0.16
Reverting it on top of v6.0.16 and 6.0.17-rc1 fixed the problem.
This is also in v6.1.y but the issue is not seen there, and I am
trying to figure out why.
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-03 22:59 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2023-01-04 11:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-01-04 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudip Mukherjee
Cc: David S. Miller, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
srw, rwarsow
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:59:58PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 10:37, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> > > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > mips: Booted on ci20 board. VNC server did not start, will try a bisect
> > later tonight.
>
> bisect pointed to 2575eebf1bd2 ("net: Return errno in
> sk->sk_prot->get_port().") introduced in v6.0.16
> Reverting it on top of v6.0.16 and 6.0.17-rc1 fixed the problem.
>
> This is also in v6.1.y but the issue is not seen there, and I am
> trying to figure out why.
As there's probably only going to be one more 6.0.y release before it is
end-of-life, if you can't figure it out, not that big of a deal :)
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-03 10:37 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2023-01-03 12:07 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-01-03 13:23 ` Allen Pais
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-01-03 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 537 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-03 12:07 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-01-03 13:23 ` Allen Pais
2023-01-03 15:33 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-01-03 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-03 13:23 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-01-03 15:33 ` Jon Hunter
2023-01-03 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-01-03 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:21:33 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.0:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
130 tests: 130 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.0.17-rc1-g9c0ac88985a8
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-03 15:33 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2023-01-03 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-01-03 22:11 ` Ron Economos
2023-01-04 1:38 ` Justin Forbes
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-01-03 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 1/2/23 03:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-03 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-01-03 22:11 ` Ron Economos
2023-01-04 1:38 ` Justin Forbes
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-01-03 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 1/2/23 3:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review
2023-01-02 11:21 [PATCH 6.0 00/74] 6.0.17-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-03 22:11 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-01-04 1:38 ` Justin Forbes
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2023-01-04 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.17 release.
> There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 04 Jan 2023 11:05:34 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.0.17-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.0.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread