Re: [Patch v3 Part2 1/9] x86/microcode: Taint kernel only if microcode loading was successful

[Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:17:25PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2023/1/31 5:39, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > Currently when late loading is aborted due to check_online_cpu(), kernel
> > still ends up tainting the kernel.
> > 
> > Taint only when microcode loading was successful.
> > 

[snip]

> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> > index 61d57d9b93ee..1c6831b8b244 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> > @@ -472,7 +472,8 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
> >   	enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK;
> >   	int bsp = boot_cpu_data.cpu_index;
> >   	unsigned long val;
> > -	ssize_t ret = 0;
> > +	int load_ret = -1;
> > +	ssize_t ret;
> >   	ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
> >   	if (ret)
> > @@ -488,20 +489,26 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
> >   		goto put;
> >   	tmp_ret = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(bsp, &microcode_pdev->dev);
> > -	if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW)
> > +	if (tmp_ret != UCODE_NEW) {
> > +		ret = size;
> >   		goto put;
> > +	}
> >   	mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
> > -	ret = microcode_reload_late();
> > +	load_ret = microcode_reload_late();
> >   	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
> >   put:
> >   	cpus_read_unlock();
> > -	if (ret == 0)
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Taint only when loading was successful
> > +	 */
> > +	if (load_ret == 0) {
> >   		ret = size;
> 
> What about if loading was not successful(load_ret != 0)?
> ret has no chance to be returned as size here and we'll run into the endless
> update?

Good catch, we'll need to make that some meaningful return code to stop the
endless wait.