public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Jay Dolan <jay.dolan@accesio.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] serial: 8250_pci: Split Pericom driver
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:25:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZyzmzjVH35U05Wj@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ede18fd7-266e-406d-0c9c-570d95ab3673@accesio.com>

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 09:19:09PM -0800, Jay Dolan wrote:
> On 11/22/21 4:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 02:47:20PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:32:51PM -0800, Jay Dolan wrote:
> > > > On 11/17/21 6:57 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > Split Pericom driver to a separate module.
> > > > > While at it, re-enable high baud rates.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jay, can you, please, test this on as many hardware as you have?
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > * Add in pericom_do_startup() because the UPF_MAGIC_MULTIPLIER doesn't
> > > > stick.
> > > 
> > > Can't find an evidence that this is the case. Can you recheck this (reading
> > > flags back via sysfs or so)? So, for v2 I'll leave my approach.
> > 
> > Otherwise how the other drivers which are using that flag survive? If it's
> > indeed an issue, it should be fixed on generic level.
> > 
> 
> I modified pericom_do_startup to log when the UPF_MAGIC_MULTIPLIER flag was
> present. Then tried to set the port to 3000000 a few times. The port
> stayed at 9600. It looks like pericom_do_startup() is getting called twice
> per port on boot, and the flag is gone with the second one.
> 
> [    4.925577] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.926121] [J4D[ flag not present
> [    4.926843] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.927415] [J4D[ flag not present
> [    4.928106] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.928673] [J4D[ flag not present
> [    4.929419] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.930447] [J4D[ flag not present
> 
> [   49.528504] [J4D[ flag not present
> [   51.675240] [J4D[ flag not present
> [   59.617954] [J4D[ flag not present
> 
> Then I modified it to log when it was adding the flag in. The port was set
> to 3000000. Also the flag only needed to be added in once. It sticks after
> the first time.
> 
> [    4.647546] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.648119] [J4D] flag not present(adding)
> [    4.648778] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.649330] [J4D] flag not present(adding)
> [    4.650001] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.650537] [J4D] flag not present(adding)
> [    4.651192] [J4D] flag present
> [    4.651718] [J4D] flag not present(adding)
> 
> [   96.025668] [J4D] flag present
> [  100.130626] [J4D] flag present
> [  116.435436] [J4D] flag present
> 
> I mostly just guessed at do_startup() being the place to set the magic
> multiplier flag after it didn't stick in quirk in 8250_pci.c.

Can you share `dmesg` and output of `lspci -nk -vv` on the machine with the
kernel with patches applied and running?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-23  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17 14:57 [PATCH v1 0/2] serial: 8250_pci: Split Pericom driver Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-17 14:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] serial: 8250_pci: Split out " Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-18  1:12   ` Jay Dolan
2021-11-18  9:50     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-18 14:45       ` Jay Dolan
2021-11-17 14:57 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] serial: 8250_pericom: Re-enable higher baud rates Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-19  6:32 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] serial: 8250_pci: Split Pericom driver Jay Dolan
2021-11-19  8:23   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-19 14:33     ` Jay Dolan
2021-11-20 21:05       ` Jay Dolan
2021-11-21 10:16         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-21 15:36           ` Jay Dolan
2021-11-22 12:47   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-22 12:48     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-23  5:19       ` Jay Dolan
2021-11-23  9:25         ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-11-23 15:02           ` Jay Dolan
2021-11-23 15:38             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-24  4:29               ` Jay Dolan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZyzmzjVH35U05Wj@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jay.dolan@accesio.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox