From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Bui Quang Minh" <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: Use separate work structs on css release path
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 13:43:10 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ypf5jpI7dSmpi4W0@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fb4d8d7-ccc0-b020-715e-38c2dfd94c23@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 04:37:17PM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> Yes, but as far as I can see the percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(&css->refcnt, css_killed_ref_fn)
> doesn't change the value of the refcnt, it just causes the css_killed_ref_fn() to be called
Yeah, the base ref is special for percpu_ref.
> on it. Only css_get() & css_put() modify the refcnt value.
> And for the "free the thing" the css_killed_work_fn() does that.
> It calls offline_css(css) and css_put(css) for the whole css hierarchy.
Yeah, the freeing path depends on the css_put(css) invoking css_release()
which schedules the work item which actually frees. Am I misunderstanding
something here?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 15:15 [PATCH 0/2] cgroup_subsys_state lifecycle fixups Michal Koutný
2022-05-25 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Wait for cgroup_subsys_state offlining on unmount Michal Koutný
2022-05-25 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: Use separate work structs on css release path Michal Koutný
2022-05-25 16:14 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-26 9:56 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-26 18:15 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-27 16:39 ` Tadeusz Struk
2022-05-27 16:54 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-27 17:23 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-01 23:13 ` Tadeusz Struk
2022-06-01 23:20 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-01 23:37 ` Tadeusz Struk
2022-06-01 23:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2022-06-02 0:00 ` Tadeusz Struk
2022-06-02 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-02 0:26 ` Tadeusz Struk
2022-06-02 0:29 ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-02 0:40 ` Tadeusz Struk
2022-06-02 11:47 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-02 14:28 ` Tadeusz Struk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ypf5jpI7dSmpi4W0@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tadeusz.struk@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox