From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>, Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, devel@lists.orangefs.org,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mainline build failure due to 6c77676645ad ("iov_iter: Fix iter_xarray_get_pages{,_alloc}()")
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:56:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqSQ++8UnEW0AJ2y@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqSMmC/UuQpXdxtR@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 12:37:44PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 12:12:47PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>
>
> > At a guess, should be
> > return min((size_t)nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
> >
> > in both places. I'm more than half-asleep right now; could you verify that it
> > (as the last lines of both iter_xarray_get_pages() and iter_xarray_get_pages_alloc())
> > builds correctly?
>
> No, I'm misreading it - it's unsigned * unsigned long - unsigned vs. size_t.
> On arm it ends up with unsigned long vs. unsigned int; functionally it *is*
> OK (both have the same range there), but it triggers the tests. Try
>
> return min_t(size_t, nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
>
> there (both places).
The reason we can't overflow on multiplication there, BTW, is that we have
nr <= count, and count has come from weirdly open-coded
DIV_ROUND_UP(size + offset, PAGE_SIZE)
IMO we'd better make it explicit, so how about the following:
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
index dda6d5f481c1..150dbd314d25 100644
--- a/lib/iov_iter.c
+++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
@@ -1445,15 +1445,7 @@ static ssize_t iter_xarray_get_pages(struct iov_iter *i,
offset = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
*_start_offset = offset;
- count = 1;
- if (size > PAGE_SIZE - offset) {
- size -= PAGE_SIZE - offset;
- count += size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- size &= ~PAGE_MASK;
- if (size)
- count++;
- }
-
+ count = DIV_ROUND_UP(size + offset, PAGE_SIZE);
if (count > maxpages)
count = maxpages;
@@ -1461,7 +1453,7 @@ static ssize_t iter_xarray_get_pages(struct iov_iter *i,
if (nr == 0)
return 0;
- return min(nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
+ return min_t(size_t, nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
}
/* must be done on non-empty ITER_IOVEC one */
@@ -1607,15 +1599,7 @@ static ssize_t iter_xarray_get_pages_alloc(struct iov_iter *i,
offset = pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
*_start_offset = offset;
- count = 1;
- if (size > PAGE_SIZE - offset) {
- size -= PAGE_SIZE - offset;
- count += size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- size &= ~PAGE_MASK;
- if (size)
- count++;
- }
-
+ count = DIV_ROUND_UP(size + offset, PAGE_SIZE);
p = get_pages_array(count);
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1625,7 +1609,7 @@ static ssize_t iter_xarray_get_pages_alloc(struct iov_iter *i,
if (nr == 0)
return 0;
- return min(nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
+ return min_t(size_t, nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
}
ssize_t iov_iter_get_pages_alloc(struct iov_iter *i,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-11 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-11 10:45 mainline build failure due to 6c77676645ad ("iov_iter: Fix iter_xarray_get_pages{,_alloc}()") Sudip Mukherjee
2022-06-11 10:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-06-11 12:12 ` Al Viro
2022-06-11 12:37 ` Al Viro
2022-06-11 12:56 ` Al Viro [this message]
2022-06-11 14:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-11 15:01 ` Al Viro
2022-06-11 15:39 ` Al Viro
2022-06-11 23:16 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-06-13 9:19 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqSQ++8UnEW0AJ2y@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox