From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
LKML Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
X86-kernel <x86@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Jacon Jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/microcode/intel: Check against CPU signature before saving microcode
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:18:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwkAaP4O0fospJyI@araj-dh-work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwjzosEnhr3sGKMR@zn.tnic>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 06:24:02PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:27:57AM +0000, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > Old patch header rev is fms3
> > New patch header is fms2
> > Your CPU sig is fms2.
>
> Can you pls give me exact reproduction instructions how you come to this
> situation?
Sure, the problem is that code base is something I *never* wanted to post,
since its not architectural.
The hard part is to split some of the internal code out and have a plain
version on public tree that can reproduce.
You may need additional hackery since you won't have the additional
revisions for testing. I'll try to hack something up
Cheers,
Ashok
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-17 5:11 [PATCH v3 0/5] Making microcode late-load robust Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 5:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/microcode/intel: Check against CPU signature before saving microcode Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-17 10:45 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-19 10:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-23 11:13 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-24 19:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-25 3:27 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-26 16:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-26 17:18 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-08-26 17:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 5:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/microcode/intel: Allow a late-load only if a min rev is specified Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-19 11:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-23 0:08 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-24 19:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-25 4:02 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-26 12:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 5:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/microcode: Avoid any chance of MCE's during microcode update Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-17 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-17 8:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 11:57 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 12:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 12:30 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-17 15:06 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-29 14:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-08-17 11:40 ` Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 5:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/x2apic: Support x2apic self IPI with NMI_VECTOR Ashok Raj
2022-08-17 5:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86/microcode: Place siblings in NMI loop while update in progress Ashok Raj
2022-08-30 19:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwkAaP4O0fospJyI@araj-dh-work \
--to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox