Re: [RFC] x86/alternatives: Merge first and second step in text_poke_bp_batch

[Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 03:17:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 03:02:37PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > while checking on similar code for uprobes I was wondering if we
> > can merge first 2 steps of instruction update in text_poke_bp_batch
> > function.
> > 
> > Basically the first step now would be to write int3 byte together
> > with the rest of the bytes of the new instruction instead of doing
> > that separately. And the second step would be to overwrite int3
> > byte with first byte of the new instruction.
> > 
> > Would that work or do I miss some x86 detail that could lead to crash?
> 
> I *think* it will work on most modern systems, but I'm very sure I don't
> have all the details.
> 
> IIRC this is the magic recipe blessed by both Intel and AMD, and
> if we're going to be changing this I would want both vendors to sign off
> on that.

ok

> 
> > I tried to hack it together in attached patch and it speeds up a bit
> > text_poke_bp_batch as shown below.
> 
> Why do we care about performance here?

just a benefit of doing that change.. but mainly I was just curious
on why those first steps are separated

thanks,
jirka