Re: [PATCH v10 09/14] platform/x86: Rename alienware-wmi.c

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:31:34PM -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
> On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 11:41 AM -05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:46:05AM -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
> >> Rename alienware-wmi to support upcoming split.
> >
> > (the change that is caught by my eye and induced this review session)

...

> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_ALIENWARE_WMI)		+= alienware-wmi.o
> >> +alienware-wmi-objs			:= alienware-wmi-base.o
> >
> > objs is incorrect! Please use correct y instead.
> 
> I want to understand what is exactly wrong here. This `objs` pattern is
> used a lot in this file, so I just copied it. For example [1].

It doesn't mean it's a good pattern to copy.

> Is it wrong to do it here for a single file? Is it wrong to do it at
> all?

If the compilation unit is in-kernel unit (either built-in or a module) the -y
should be used, for the user space tools which are build inside the kernel the
-objs should be used. This all implied in the respective documentation.

> My goal is to split the file, but link it all together in a single
> module.
> 
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc2/source/drivers/platform/x86/dell/Makefile#L14

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko