public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: don't use gpiochip_get_direction() when registering a chip
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:22:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z73EIu0AqnfPU33k@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225-retval-fixes-v1-1-078c4c98517a@linaro.org>

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:56:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> During chip registration we should neither check the return value of
> gc->get_direction() nor hold the SRCU lock when calling it. The former
> is because pin controllers may have pins set to alternate functions and
> return errors from their get_direction() callbacks. That's alright - we
> should default to the safe INPUT state and not bail-out. The latter is
> not needed because we haven't registered the chip yet so there's nothing
> to protect against dynamic removal. In fact: we currently hit a lockdep
> splat. Revert to calling the gc->get_direction() callback directly not
> not checking its value.

...

I think the below code deserves a commit (as a summary of the above commit
message).

> +		if (gc->get_direction && gpiochip_line_is_valid(gc, desc_index))
> +			assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags,
> +				   !gc->get_direction(gc, desc_index));
> +		else
>  			assign_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT,
>  				   &desc->flags, !gc->direction_input);

Otherwise LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-25 11:56 [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: fix bugs in retval sanitization Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-25 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: don't use gpiochip_get_direction() when registering a chip Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-25 13:22   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-02-25 13:22   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-02-25 14:43     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-25 14:46       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-25 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] gpiolib: use a more explicit retval logic in gpiochip_get_direction() Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-25 13:19   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-25 11:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] gpiolib: don't double-check the gc->get callback's existence Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-02-25 13:20   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z73EIu0AqnfPU33k@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox