[PATCH 0/2] docs: core-api: Update kernel-api.rst to include cpumask.h

[PATCH 0/2] docs: core-api: Update kernel-api.rst to include cpumask.h

[Viresh Kumar]

Hello,

This includes cpumask.h in kernel-api.rst and fixes some kernel-doc formatting
warnings/errors.

Viresh Kumar (2):
  cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h
  docs: core-api: Update kernel-api.rst to include cpumask.h

 Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst |  6 +++
 include/linux/cpumask.h               | 65 +++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514

[PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h

[Viresh Kumar]

This fixes various kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h:

- WARNING: Inline literal start-string without end-string.
- ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
- ERROR: Unknown target name: "gfp".

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 36a890d0dd57..73ba808c559f 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
  * cpumask_pr_args - printf args to output a cpumask
  * @maskp: cpumask to be printed
  *
- * Can be used to provide arguments for '%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.
+ * Can be used to provide arguments for '\%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.
  */
 #define cpumask_pr_args(maskp)		nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(maskp)
 
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *src
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & *srcp2
+ * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from \*srcp1 & \*srcp2
  * @srcp1: the first input
  * @srcp2: the second input
  *
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_first_and_and - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & *srcp2 & *srcp3
+ * cpumask_first_and_and - return the first cpu from \*srcp1 & \*srcp2 & \*srcp3
  * @srcp1: the first input
  * @srcp2: the second input
  * @srcp3: the third input
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
 #endif /* NR_CPUS */
 
 /**
- * cpumask_next_and - get the next cpu in *src1p & *src2p
+ * cpumask_next_and - get the next cpu in \*src1p & \*src2p
  * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (i.e. return will be > @n)
  * @src1p: the first cpumask pointer
  * @src2p: the second cpumask pointer
@@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ unsigned int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int sta
  * @mask2: the second cpumask pointer
  *
  * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places.  It is equivalent to:
+ *
+ * .. code-block:: c
+ *
  *	struct cpumask tmp;
  *	cpumask_and(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
  *	for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)
@@ -353,6 +356,9 @@ unsigned int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int sta
  * @mask2: the second cpumask pointer
  *
  * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places.  It is equivalent to:
+ *
+ * .. code-block:: c
+ *
  *	struct cpumask tmp;
  *	cpumask_andnot(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
  *	for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)
@@ -370,6 +376,9 @@ unsigned int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int sta
  * @mask2: the second cpumask pointer
  *
  * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places.  It is equivalent to:
+ *
+ * .. code-block:: c
+ *
  *	struct cpumask tmp;
  *	cpumask_or(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
  *	for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)
@@ -411,7 +420,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_any_and_but - pick an arbitrary cpu from *mask1 & *mask2, but not this one.
+ * cpumask_any_and_but - pick an arbitrary cpu from \*mask1 & \*mask2, but not this one.
  * @mask1: the first input cpumask
  * @mask2: the second input cpumask
  * @cpu: the cpu to ignore
@@ -545,7 +554,7 @@ static __always_inline void __cpumask_clear_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *dstp)
  * cpumask_assign_cpu - assign a cpu in a cpumask
  * @cpu: cpu number (< nr_cpu_ids)
  * @dstp: the cpumask pointer
- * @bool: the value to assign
+ * @value: the value to assign
  */
 static __always_inline void cpumask_assign_cpu(int cpu, struct cpumask *dstp, bool value)
 {
@@ -623,7 +632,7 @@ static __always_inline void cpumask_clear(struct cpumask *dstp)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_and - *dstp = *src1p & *src2p
+ * cpumask_and - \*dstp = \*src1p & \*src2p
  * @dstp: the cpumask result
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
@@ -639,7 +648,7 @@ bool cpumask_and(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *src1p,
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_or - *dstp = *src1p | *src2p
+ * cpumask_or - \*dstp = \*src1p | \*src2p
  * @dstp: the cpumask result
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
@@ -653,7 +662,7 @@ void cpumask_or(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *src1p,
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_xor - *dstp = *src1p ^ *src2p
+ * cpumask_xor - \*dstp = \*src1p ^ \*src2p
  * @dstp: the cpumask result
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
@@ -667,7 +676,7 @@ void cpumask_xor(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *src1p,
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_andnot - *dstp = *src1p & ~*src2p
+ * cpumask_andnot - \*dstp = \*src1p & ~\*src2p
  * @dstp: the cpumask result
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
@@ -683,7 +692,7 @@ bool cpumask_andnot(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *src1p,
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_equal - *src1p == *src2p
+ * cpumask_equal - \*src1p == \*src2p
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
  *
@@ -697,7 +706,7 @@ bool cpumask_equal(const struct cpumask *src1p, const struct cpumask *src2p)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_or_equal - *src1p | *src2p == *src3p
+ * cpumask_or_equal - \*src1p | \*src2p == \*src3p
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
  * @src3p: the third input
@@ -714,7 +723,7 @@ bool cpumask_or_equal(const struct cpumask *src1p, const struct cpumask *src2p,
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_intersects - (*src1p & *src2p) != 0
+ * cpumask_intersects - (\*src1p & \*src2p) != 0
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
  *
@@ -729,7 +738,7 @@ bool cpumask_intersects(const struct cpumask *src1p, const struct cpumask *src2p
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_subset - (*src1p & ~*src2p) == 0
+ * cpumask_subset - (\*src1p & ~\*src2p) == 0
  * @src1p: the first input
  * @src2p: the second input
  *
@@ -743,7 +752,7 @@ bool cpumask_subset(const struct cpumask *src1p, const struct cpumask *src2p)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_empty - *srcp == 0
+ * cpumask_empty - \*srcp == 0
  * @srcp: the cpumask to that all cpus < nr_cpu_ids are clear.
  *
  * Return: true if srcp is empty (has no bits set), else false
@@ -754,7 +763,7 @@ static __always_inline bool cpumask_empty(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_full - *srcp == 0xFFFFFFFF...
+ * cpumask_full - \*srcp == 0xFFFFFFFF...
  * @srcp: the cpumask to that all cpus < nr_cpu_ids are set.
  *
  * Return: true if srcp is full (has all bits set), else false
@@ -765,10 +774,10 @@ static __always_inline bool cpumask_full(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_weight - Count of bits in *srcp
+ * cpumask_weight - Count of bits in \*srcp
  * @srcp: the cpumask to count bits (< nr_cpu_ids) in.
  *
- * Return: count of bits set in *srcp
+ * Return: count of bits set in \*srcp
  */
 static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_weight(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 {
@@ -776,11 +785,11 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_weight(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_weight_and - Count of bits in (*srcp1 & *srcp2)
+ * cpumask_weight_and - Count of bits in (\*srcp1 & \*srcp2)
  * @srcp1: the cpumask to count bits (< nr_cpu_ids) in.
  * @srcp2: the cpumask to count bits (< nr_cpu_ids) in.
  *
- * Return: count of bits set in both *srcp1 and *srcp2
+ * Return: count of bits set in both \*srcp1 and \*srcp2
  */
 static __always_inline
 unsigned int cpumask_weight_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
@@ -789,11 +798,11 @@ unsigned int cpumask_weight_and(const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumas
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_weight_andnot - Count of bits in (*srcp1 & ~*srcp2)
+ * cpumask_weight_andnot - Count of bits in (\*srcp1 & ~\*srcp2)
  * @srcp1: the cpumask to count bits (< nr_cpu_ids) in.
  * @srcp2: the cpumask to count bits (< nr_cpu_ids) in.
  *
- * Return: count of bits set in both *srcp1 and *srcp2
+ * Return: count of bits set in both \*srcp1 and \*srcp2
  */
 static __always_inline
 unsigned int cpumask_weight_andnot(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
@@ -803,7 +812,7 @@ unsigned int cpumask_weight_andnot(const struct cpumask *srcp1,
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_shift_right - *dstp = *srcp >> n
+ * cpumask_shift_right - \*dstp = \*srcp >> n
  * @dstp: the cpumask result
  * @srcp: the input to shift
  * @n: the number of bits to shift by
@@ -816,7 +825,7 @@ void cpumask_shift_right(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *srcp, int n
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_shift_left - *dstp = *srcp << n
+ * cpumask_shift_left - \*dstp = \*srcp << n
  * @dstp: the cpumask result
  * @srcp: the input to shift
  * @n: the number of bits to shift by
@@ -829,7 +838,7 @@ void cpumask_shift_left(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *srcp, int n)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_copy - *dstp = *srcp
+ * cpumask_copy - \*dstp = \*srcp
  * @dstp: the result
  * @srcp: the input cpumask
  */
@@ -840,7 +849,7 @@ void cpumask_copy(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *srcp)
 }
 
 /**
- * cpumask_any - pick an arbitrary cpu from *srcp
+ * cpumask_any - pick an arbitrary cpu from \*srcp
  * @srcp: the input cpumask
  *
  * Return: >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set.
@@ -848,7 +857,7 @@ void cpumask_copy(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *srcp)
 #define cpumask_any(srcp) cpumask_first(srcp)
 
 /**
- * cpumask_any_and - pick an arbitrary cpu from *mask1 & *mask2
+ * cpumask_any_and - pick an arbitrary cpu from \*mask1 & \*mask2
  * @mask1: the first input cpumask
  * @mask2: the second input cpumask
  *
@@ -941,7 +950,7 @@ bool zalloc_cpumask_var_node(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags, int node)
 /**
  * alloc_cpumask_var - allocate a struct cpumask
  * @mask: pointer to cpumask_var_t where the cpumask is returned
- * @flags: GFP_ flags
+ * @flags: GFP\_ flags
  *
  * Only defined when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y, otherwise is
  * a nop returning a constant 1 (in <linux/cpumask.h>).
-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h

[Akira Yokosawa]

Hello Viresh,

On Thu,  6 Mar 2025 16:06:50 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This fixes various kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h:
> 
> - WARNING: Inline literal start-string without end-string.
> - ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
> - ERROR: Unknown target name: "gfp".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 36a890d0dd57..73ba808c559f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>   * cpumask_pr_args - printf args to output a cpumask
>   * @maskp: cpumask to be printed
>   *
> - * Can be used to provide arguments for '%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.
> + * Can be used to provide arguments for '\%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.

kernel-doc (script) can recognize the pattern of %*pb but not %*pb[l].
"%*bp [l]" should work here.
(without quotes and a white space in front of "[").

No need to escape "%".

>   */
>  #define cpumask_pr_args(maskp)		nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(maskp)
>  
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *src
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & *srcp2
> + * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from \*srcp1 & \*srcp2

kernel-doc (script) understands the pattern of *@srcp1.
No need to escape "*".

But it does not (yet) parse the pattern of "*@n+1".  You need to say
"*@n +1", with a space in front of "+1", for the time being.

[...]
> @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ unsigned int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int sta
>   * @mask2: the second cpumask pointer
>   *
>   * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places.  It is equivalent to:
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: c
> + *
>   *	struct cpumask tmp;
>   *	cpumask_and(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
>   *	for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)

Do you really want those code-blocks to look fancy?

In kernel-doc comments, I'd normally use plain literal blocks instead.

Something like:

 * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places.  It is equivalent to::
 *
 *	struct cpumask tmp;
 *	cpumask_and(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
 *	for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)

should work.  Note the "::" and the empty line below it.

[...]
> @@ -941,7 +950,7 @@ bool zalloc_cpumask_var_node(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags, int node)
>  /**
>   * alloc_cpumask_var - allocate a struct cpumask
>   * @mask: pointer to cpumask_var_t where the cpumask is returned
> - * @flags: GFP_ flags
> + * @flags: GFP\_ flags

You can say:

    * @flags: %GFP_ flags

instead.

>   *
>   * Only defined when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y, otherwise is
>   * a nop returning a constant 1 (in <linux/cpumask.h>).

[...]

Side note:

I think 1/2 would be better to be CC'ed linux-doc as well.
Please do so in respin. 

        Thanks, Akira

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h

[Yury Norov]

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:38:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> Hello Viresh,
> 
> On Thu,  6 Mar 2025 16:06:50 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > This fixes various kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h:
> > 
> > - WARNING: Inline literal start-string without end-string.
> > - ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
> > - ERROR: Unknown target name: "gfp".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/cpumask.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> > index 36a890d0dd57..73ba808c559f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> >   * cpumask_pr_args - printf args to output a cpumask
> >   * @maskp: cpumask to be printed
> >   *
> > - * Can be used to provide arguments for '%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.
> > + * Can be used to provide arguments for '\%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.
> 
> kernel-doc (script) can recognize the pattern of %*pb but not %*pb[l].
> "%*bp [l]" should work here.
> (without quotes and a white space in front of "[").

So why not fixing kernel-doc instead?
 
> No need to escape "%".
> 
> >   */
> >  #define cpumask_pr_args(maskp)		nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(maskp)
> >  
> > @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *src
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from *srcp1 & *srcp2
> > + * cpumask_first_and - return the first cpu from \*srcp1 & \*srcp2
> 
> kernel-doc (script) understands the pattern of *@srcp1.
> No need to escape "*".

Yes, please don't do it. The comments first and foremost should be a
human-readable text. If we add C code, it should stay a C code.

> But it does not (yet) parse the pattern of "*@n+1".  You need to say
> "*@n +1", with a space in front of "+1", for the time being.
> 
> [...]
> > @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ unsigned int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int sta
> >   * @mask2: the second cpumask pointer
> >   *
> >   * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places.  It is equivalent to:
> > + *
> > + * .. code-block:: c
> > + *
> >   *	struct cpumask tmp;
> >   *	cpumask_and(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
> >   *	for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)
> 
> Do you really want those code-blocks to look fancy?
> 
> In kernel-doc comments, I'd normally use plain literal blocks instead.
> 
> Something like:
> 
>  * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places.  It is equivalent to::
>  *
>  *	struct cpumask tmp;
>  *	cpumask_and(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
>  *	for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)
> 
> should work.  Note the "::" and the empty line below it.
> 
> [...]
> > @@ -941,7 +950,7 @@ bool zalloc_cpumask_var_node(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags, int node)
> >  /**
> >   * alloc_cpumask_var - allocate a struct cpumask
> >   * @mask: pointer to cpumask_var_t where the cpumask is returned
> > - * @flags: GFP_ flags
> > + * @flags: GFP\_ flags
> 
> You can say:
> 
>     * @flags: %GFP_ flags
> 
> instead.
> 
> >   *
> >   * Only defined when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y, otherwise is
> >   * a nop returning a constant 1 (in <linux/cpumask.h>).
> 
> [...]
> 
> Side note:
> 
> I think 1/2 would be better to be CC'ed linux-doc as well.
> Please do so in respin. 

I agree. I'm all for covering cpumasks documentation with kernel-doc,
but it should stay readable after that.

Thanks,
Yury

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h

[Akira Yokosawa]

Hi,

Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:38:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>> Hello Viresh,
>>
>> On Thu,  6 Mar 2025 16:06:50 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> This fixes various kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h:
>>>
>>> - WARNING: Inline literal start-string without end-string.
>>> - ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
>>> - ERROR: Unknown target name: "gfp".
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>>> index 36a890d0dd57..73ba808c559f 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>>>   * cpumask_pr_args - printf args to output a cpumask
>>>   * @maskp: cpumask to be printed
>>>   *
>>> - * Can be used to provide arguments for '%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.
>>> + * Can be used to provide arguments for '\%*pb[l]' when printing a cpumask.
>>
>> kernel-doc (script) can recognize the pattern of %*pb but not %*pb[l].
>> "%*bp [l]" should work here.
>> (without quotes and a white space in front of "[").
> 
> So why not fixing kernel-doc instead?

That would be great!

At the moment, re-implementation of kernel-doc into python is under way [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/cover.1740387599.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/

It is a bug compatible porting from perl to python3, but it is likely
to be merged during 6.16 merge window.

I think it would be nicer to do the fix on top of python3 kernel-doc
after that happens.

        Thanks, Akira

>  
>> No need to escape "%".
>>
>>>   */
>>>  #define cpumask_pr_args(maskp)		nr_cpu_ids, cpumask_bits(maskp)
>>>  
[...]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Fix kernel-doc formatting errors in cpumask.h

[Viresh Kumar]

On 07-03-25, 00:38, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> I think 1/2 would be better to be CC'ed linux-doc as well.
> Please do so in respin. 

Thanks for the feedback Akira. linux-doc is cc'd now for entire series.

-- 
viresh

[PATCH 2/2] docs: core-api: Update kernel-api.rst to include cpumask.h

[Viresh Kumar]

Updated Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst to include `cpumask.h`,
providing better reference for CPU mask operations in the kernel API.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst b/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst
index ae92a2571388..5817632381f9 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/kernel-api.rst
@@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ Bitmap Operations
 .. kernel-doc:: include/linux/bitmap.h
    :internal:
 
+Cpumask Operations
+------------------
+
+.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/cpumask.h
+   :internal:
+
 Command-line Parsing
 --------------------
 
-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514