* RE: [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review
2023-03-16 8:49 [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-03-16 11:13 ` Chris Paterson
2023-03-16 17:46 ` Florian Fainelli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Paterson @ 2023-03-16 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Hello Greg,
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: 16 March 2023 08:50
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.237 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP configurations built and booted with Linux 5.4.237-rc2 (1baba0e91ac5):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/808352559
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/commits/linux-5.4.y
Tested-by: Chris Paterson (CIP) <chris.paterson2@renesas.com>
Kind regards, Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review
2023-03-16 8:49 [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-16 11:13 ` Chris Paterson
@ 2023-03-16 17:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-03-16 19:06 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-03-16 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 3/16/23 01:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.237 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.237-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review
2023-03-16 8:49 [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-16 11:13 ` Chris Paterson
2023-03-16 17:46 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-03-16 19:06 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-03-16 21:59 ` Tom Saeger
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2023-03-16 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 16/03/23 2:19 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.237 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
No problems detected on x86_64 and aarch64.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.237-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review
2023-03-16 8:49 [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-16 19:06 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2023-03-16 21:59 ` Tom Saeger
2023-03-16 22:54 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tom Saeger @ 2023-03-16 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.237 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.237-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Build ID for arm64 is back with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y
Hooray!
Tested-by: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review
2023-03-16 8:49 [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-16 21:59 ` Tom Saeger
@ 2023-03-16 22:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-17 2:01 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-03-17 10:20 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-03-16 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.237 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 455 pass: 455 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review
2023-03-16 8:49 [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-16 22:54 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-03-17 2:01 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-03-17 10:20 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-03-17 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 14:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.237 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.237-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.237-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 1baba0e91ac5e439c0e58b2d241a6aac8d50191c
* git describe: v5.4.235-60-g1baba0e91ac5
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.235-60-g1baba0e91ac5
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.235)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.235)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.235)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.235)
## Test result summary
total: 117469, pass: 95900, fail: 2961, skip: 18470, xfail: 138
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 146 total, 145 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 46 total, 42 passed, 4 failed
* i386: 28 total, 22 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 30 total, 29 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 33 total, 32 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 12 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 39 total, 37 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review
2023-03-16 8:49 [PATCH 5.4 00/55] 5.4.237-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-17 2:01 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-03-17 10:20 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2023-03-17 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.237 release.
> There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230311):
mips: 65 configs -> 1 failure
arm: 106 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
mips build failure:
lasat_defconfig -> failed
arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:42:44: error: expected ')' before '&' token
42 | static DECLARE_TASKLET(pvc_display_tasklet, &pvc_display, 0);
| ^~
| )
arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c: In function 'pvc_line_proc_write':
arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:27: error: 'pvc_display_tasklet' undeclared (first use in this function)
87 | tasklet_schedule(&pvc_display_tasklet);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
At top level:
arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:33:13: error: 'pvc_display' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
33 | static void pvc_display(unsigned long data)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
Boot Regression on test laptop.
[ 3.473713] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000007c
[ 3.473720] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 3.473722] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 3.473723] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 3.473727] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[ 3.473730] CPU: 0 PID: 114 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.4.237-rc2-1baba0e91ac5+ #1
[ 3.473732] Hardware name: LENOVO 4287CTO/4287CTO, BIOS 8DET68WW (1.38 ) 04/11/2013
[ 3.473798] RIP: 0010:intel_context_unpin+0xe/0x120 [i915]
[ 3.473804] Code: 60 00 e9 44 ff ff ff be 02 00 00 00 e8 8b 8d d3 fa eb ae 41 bd fc ff ff ff eb b2 90 66 66 66 66 90 41 55 48 8d 57 7c 41 54 55 <8b> 47 7c 48 89 fd 83 f8 01 74 0f 8d 48 ff f0 0f b1 0a 75 f2 5d 41
[ 3.473808] RSP: 0018:ffff9d6900167a58 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 3.473811] RAX: ffff8898905c9400 RBX: ffff889787fea000 RCX: ffff8898905c94c0
[ 3.473814] RDX: 000000000000007c RSI: ffff8898905caac0 RDI: 0000000000000000
[ 3.473817] RBP: ffff889787fea000 R08: ffff889891f86160 R09: ffff8898960af4b8
[ 3.473820] R10: ffff88978757a0c0 R11: 00000000030c44f5 R12: 00000000fffffffa
[ 3.473823] R13: ffff8898913feb80 R14: ffffffffc04e4bf0 R15: ffff889891f877c8
[ 3.473827] FS: 00007f5b0f8648c0(0000) GS:ffff889896000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 3.473830] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 3.473833] CR2: 000000000000007c CR3: 000000021100c005 CR4: 00000000000606f0
[ 3.473836] Call Trace:
[ 3.473893] intel_engine_cleanup_common+0xb7/0x1f0 [i915]
[ 3.473947] intel_ring_submission_init+0x60/0x110 [i915]
[ 3.473999] intel_engines_init+0x44/0xa0 [i915]
[ 3.474056] i915_gem_init+0x1f7/0x7e0 [i915]
[ 3.474118] ? intel_modeset_init+0x101e/0x1c70 [i915]
[ 3.474167] i915_driver_probe+0xc43/0x14f0 [i915]
[ 3.474175] ? __kernfs_new_node+0x156/0x1b0
[ 3.474180] ? kfree+0xb3/0x230
[ 3.474229] ? i915_pci_probe+0x3f/0x150 [i915]
[ 3.474234] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80
[ 3.474240] ? _cond_resched+0x16/0x40
[ 3.474245] pci_device_probe+0xfd/0x1b0
[ 3.474251] really_probe+0x160/0x400
[ 3.474255] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100
[ 3.474259] device_driver_attach+0xa1/0xb0
[ 3.474263] __driver_attach+0x9b/0x140
[ 3.474267] ? device_driver_attach+0xb0/0xb0
[ 3.474271] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0
[ 3.474275] bus_add_driver+0x136/0x200
[ 3.474279] driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
[ 3.474283] ? 0xffffffffc06ec000
[ 3.474288] do_one_initcall+0x46/0x200
[ 3.474292] ? _cond_resched+0x16/0x40
[ 3.474297] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x19d/0x220
[ 3.474302] ? do_init_module+0x23/0x250
[ 3.474305] do_init_module+0x4c/0x250
[ 3.474310] __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x110
[ 3.474315] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x160
[ 3.474320] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5c/0xc1
[ 3.474324] Modules linked in: i915(+) ahci crc32c_intel libahci libata psmouse i2c_i801 scsi_mod i2c_algo_bit lpc_ich ehci_pci ehci_hcd sdhci_pci drm_kms_helper cqhci sdhci usbcore usb_common mmc_core e1000e(+) drm ptp pps_core video
[ 3.474342] CR2: 000000000000007c
[ 3.474346] ---[ end trace c956347dbb581033 ]---
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3131
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread