public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Disable broken 64-bit DMA on MSM8916
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 13:10:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGYHmC3NW1W34HVQ@gerhold.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2875f7ef-c43e-74f6-12b9-342bb2cfbaf8@linaro.org>

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:48:55AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 18.05.2023 11:39, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > While SDHCI claims to support 64-bit DMA on MSM8916 it does not seem to
> > be properly functional. It is not immediately obvious because SDHCI is
> > usually used with IOMMU bypassed on this SoC, and all physical memory
> > has 32-bit addresses. But when trying to enable the IOMMU it quickly
> > fails with an error such as the following:
> > 
> >   arm-smmu 1e00000.iommu: Unhandled context fault:
> >     fsr=0x402, iova=0xfffff200, fsynr=0xe0000, cbfrsynra=0x140, cb=3
> >   mmc1: ADMA error: 0x02000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Sys addr:  0x00000000 | Version:  0x00002e02
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Blk size:  0x00000008 | Blk cnt:  0x00000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Argument:  0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000013
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Present:   0x03f80206 | Host ctl: 0x00000019
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Power:     0x0000000f | Blk gap:  0x00000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Wake-up:   0x00000000 | Clock:    0x00000007
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Timeout:   0x0000000a | Int stat: 0x00000001
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Int enab:  0x03ff900b | Sig enab: 0x03ff100b
> >   mmc1: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Caps:      0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1:   0x00008007
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Cmd:       0x0000333a | Max curr: 0x00000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Resp[0]:   0x00000920 | Resp[1]:  0x5b590000
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Resp[2]:   0xe6487f80 | Resp[3]:  0x0a404094
> >   mmc1: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000008
> >   mmc1: sdhci: ADMA Err:  0x00000001 | ADMA Ptr: 0x0000000ffffff224
> >   mmc1: sdhci_msm: ----------- VENDOR REGISTER DUMP -----------
> >   mmc1: sdhci_msm: DLL sts: 0x00000000 | DLL cfg:  0x60006400 | DLL cfg2: 0x00000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci_msm: DLL cfg3: 0x00000000 | DLL usr ctl:  0x00000000 | DDR cfg: 0x00000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci_msm: Vndr func: 0x00018a9c | Vndr func2 : 0xf88018a8 Vndr func3: 0x00000000
> >   mmc1: sdhci: ============================================
> >   mmc1: sdhci: fffffffff200: DMA 0x0000ffffffffe100, LEN 0x0008, Attr=0x21
> >   mmc1: sdhci: fffffffff20c: DMA 0x0000000000000000, LEN 0x0000, Attr=0x03
> > 
> > Looking closely it's obvious that only the 32-bit part of the address
> > (0xfffff200) arrives at the SMMU, the higher 16-bit (0xffff...) get
> > lost somewhere. This might not be a limitation of the SDHCI itself but
> > perhaps the bus/interconnect it is connected to, or even the connection
> > to the SMMU.
> > 
> > Work around this by setting SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA to avoid
> > using 64-bit addresses.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
> > ---
> Would using 64bit address translation not require you to use (dma-)ranges
> with a greater-than-default size, like we do on newer platforms? Did you
> test that by chance?
> 

No, there is no "dma-ranges" in msm8916.dtsi. It seems to use 64-bit
(virtual) addresses by default for SDHCI, limited to 48-bit by the SMMU.

I tried limiting dma-ranges to 32-bit in msm8916.dtsi /soc@0 like
dma-ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; This seems to work as well as an
alternative to this patch, although it causes several annoying
"Invalid size 0xffffffff for dma-range(s)" warnings. I know the
0xffffffff isn't valid but I don't see how I would actually specify
2^32 there without rewriting the entire msm8916.dtsi to use
#address/size-cells = <2> instead of <1>.

It's not entirely clear to me where the actual limitation is coming from
here. It could be specific to the SDHCI (in which case this patch makes
more sense) or a general limitation of the bus/interconnect (in which
case dma-ranges might make more sense).

In any case 64-bit DMA is broken for SDHCI on MSM8916 so I would say
this patch is still the right thing to do. It's pointless to waste extra
cycles and memory to manage 64-bit pointers for SDHCI ADMA 64-bit, when
they can never work successfully on this SoC. The dma-ranges approach
doesn't change that, while SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA actually makes
it use ADMA in 32-bit mode.

Thanks,
Stephan

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-18 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-18  9:39 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Disable broken 64-bit DMA on MSM8916 Stephan Gerhold
2023-05-18  9:48 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-18 11:10   ` Stephan Gerhold [this message]
2023-05-29 14:10 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-06-08 15:53 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZGYHmC3NW1W34HVQ@gerhold.net \
    --to=stephan@gerhold.net \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox