From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
dianders@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog/hardlockup: set watchdog_hardlockup_warned to true as early as possible
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:54:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZND3fGv3e5C_JP9h@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc4da863-dacb-66a7-133d-0e6e91e4477a@linux.alibaba.com>
On Sun 2023-08-06 10:52:57, Liu Song wrote:
>
> 在 2023/8/6 01:17, Andrew Morton 写道:
> > When resending, please tell us some more about the effects of the
> > change. Presumably there are circumstances in which excess output is
> > produced? If so, describe these circumstances and the observed
> > effects.
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't found duplicate warnings in the real environment.
>
> However, considering that when system occurs hard lockup is basically
> abnormal, it
>
> seems more reasonable to set "watchdog_hardlockup_warned" to ture, rather
> than
>
> waiting for all kinds of information to be printed.
I believe that this is not needed.
watchdog_hardlockup_check(cpu, regs) is called on a CPU periodically.
There are two callers:
+ buddy detector checks the particular CPU when the solflockup's
hrtimer callback is called. See watchdog_hardlockup_kick()
in watchdog_timer_fn().
+ perf detector checks the particular CPU from a perf callback,
see watchdog_overflow_callback().
Neither timer nor perf callbacks might be nested. They are naturally
serialized on a given CPU. So, races are not possible in this case.
Best Regards,
Petr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-05 16:01 [PATCH] watchdog/hardlockup: set watchdog_hardlockup_warned to true as early as possible Liu Song
2023-08-05 17:17 ` Andrew Morton
2023-08-06 2:52 ` Liu Song
2023-08-07 13:54 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZND3fGv3e5C_JP9h@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox