From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 18:13:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYRkLfYnU3WZEWPa@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MfYG09UUfqfuE89Or4HsP8QWUBJXCvuPPhe+vx0JiZF4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:00:39PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 1:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:26:03AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 4:28 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
...
> > > Defining DEBUG makes sense to
> > > enable dev_dbg() messages.
> >
> > Exactly!
> >
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO is used by one driver
> >
> > By all drivers which are using pr_debug() / dev_dbg().
> > I am using it a lot in my development process (actually I have it enabled
> > in all my kernel configurations).
>
> I'm not saying we should remove it. It'll stay defined in the Makefile
> and remain seamless for debug messages. I just want to get rid of that
> ugly extra_checks variable which has very little impact.
I agree that extra_checks is unusual (or as Linus put it "non-standard")
thingy. And I agree that removal is for good.
My question here solely about that WARN_ON(). Do we need it always be enabled
or not?
> > > to enable code that can lead to undefined behavior (should it maybe be
> > > #if 0?).
> >
> > I don't know what you are talking about here.
>
> I'm talking about drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c and its usage of
> CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO.
Oh, that one should probably be
#if 0
...
#endif
or
if (0) {
...
}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-21 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 20:11 [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-20 11:35 ` Linus Walleij
2023-12-20 14:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-20 14:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-20 15:28 ` Linus Walleij
2023-12-21 9:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-21 12:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-21 13:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-21 16:13 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-12-21 18:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-27 14:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-16 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-16 21:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-16 22:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-17 8:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZYRkLfYnU3WZEWPa@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox