The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 18:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYRkLfYnU3WZEWPa@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MfYG09UUfqfuE89Or4HsP8QWUBJXCvuPPhe+vx0JiZF4w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:00:39PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 1:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:26:03AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 4:28 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

...

> > > Defining DEBUG makes sense to
> > > enable dev_dbg() messages.
> >
> > Exactly!
> >
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO is used by one driver
> >
> > By all drivers which are using pr_debug() / dev_dbg().
> > I am using it a lot in my development process (actually I have it enabled
> > in all my kernel configurations).
> 
> I'm not saying we should remove it. It'll stay defined in the Makefile
> and remain seamless for debug messages. I just want to get rid of that
> ugly extra_checks variable which has very little impact.

I agree that extra_checks is unusual (or as Linus put it "non-standard")
thingy. And I agree that removal is for good.

My question here solely about that WARN_ON(). Do we need it always be enabled
or not?

> > > to enable code that can lead to undefined behavior (should it maybe be
> > > #if 0?).
> >
> > I don't know what you are talking about here.
> 
> I'm talking about drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c and its usage of
> CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO.

Oh, that one should probably be

#if 0
	...
#endif

or

	if (0) {
		...
	}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-21 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-19 20:11 [RFC PATCH] gpiolib: remove extra_checks Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-20 11:35 ` Linus Walleij
2023-12-20 14:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-20 14:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-20 15:28   ` Linus Walleij
2023-12-21  9:26     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-21 12:52       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-21 13:00         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-21 16:13           ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-12-21 18:50             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-27 14:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-16 18:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-16 21:41   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-16 22:34     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-17  8:51       ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZYRkLfYnU3WZEWPa@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox