public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] wifi: mwifiex: drop asynchronous init waiting code
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:57:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_kRypMxpCT_Ecie@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411084954.GA24608@francesco-nb>

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:49:54AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:28:45PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Historically all commands sent to the mwifiex driver have been
> > asynchronous. The different commands sent during driver initialization
> > have been queued at once and only the final command has been waited
> > for being ready before finally starting the driver.
> > 
> > This has been changed in 7bff9c974e1a ("mwifiex: send firmware
> > initialization commands synchronously").
> 
> > With this the initialization is finished once the last
> > mwifiex_send_cmd_sync() (now mwifiex_send_cmd()) has returned.
> 
> Just for me, the rename/refactor happened in commit fa0ecbb9905d
> ("mwifiex: remove global variable cmd_wait_q_required"), in v3.14.
> 
> 
> > This makes all the code used to wait for the last initialization
> > command to be finished unnecessary, so it's removed in this patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cmdevt.c  | 16 ----------------
> >  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/init.c    |  5 +++--
> >  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c    | 12 ++----------
> >  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h    |  6 ------
> >  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmd.c |  4 ----
> >  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/util.c    | 18 ------------------
> >  6 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cmdevt.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cmdevt.c
> > index 5573e2ded72f2..c07857c49a713 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cmdevt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cmdevt.c
> > @@ -900,18 +900,6 @@ int mwifiex_process_cmdresp(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
> >  		ret = mwifiex_process_sta_cmdresp(priv, cmdresp_no, resp);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/* Check init command response */
> > -	if (adapter->hw_status == MWIFIEX_HW_STATUS_INITIALIZING) {
> 
> What about the code path from mwifiex_add_card()?
> 
> mwifiex_add_card()
>  -> hw_status = MWIFIEX_HW_STATUS_INITIALIZING
>  -> mwifiex_init_hw_fw(adapter, true))
>    -> request_firmware_nowait(..., mwifiex_fw_dpc)
> 
> mwifiex_fw_dpc()
>  ...
>      -> mwifiex_init_fw()
>        -> adapter->hw_status = MWIFIEX_HW_STATUS_READY  
> 
> mwifiex_fw_dpc() is called asynchronously, is everything as safe as
> before, here?

Yes, mwifiex_fw_dpc() is called asynchronously, but the first change in
my patch is in mwifiex_init_fw() which is already called asynchronously,
so my patch doesn't really change anything here.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 10:28 [PATCH 0/4] wifi: mwifiex: drop asynchronous init waiting code Sascha Hauer
2025-04-10 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] wifi: mwifiex: remove unnecessary queue empty check Sascha Hauer
2025-04-11  7:41   ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-04-10 10:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] wifi: mwifiex: let mwifiex_init_fw() return 0 for success Sascha Hauer
2025-04-11  7:58   ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-04-10 10:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] wifi: mwifiex: drop asynchronous init waiting code Sascha Hauer
2025-04-11  6:49   ` Sascha Hauer
2025-04-11  8:49   ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-04-11 12:57     ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2025-04-10 10:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] wifi: mwifiex: remove mwifiex_sta_init_cmd() last argument Sascha Hauer
2025-04-11  8:51   ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-04-22  0:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] wifi: mwifiex: drop asynchronous init waiting code Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_kRypMxpCT_Ecie@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox