* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review
2024-01-13 9:49 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-01-14 10:33 ` Pavel Machek
2024-01-15 4:48 ` Dominique Martinet
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-01-14 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.208 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review
2024-01-13 9:49 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-14 10:33 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-01-15 4:48 ` Dominique Martinet
2024-01-15 9:51 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2024-01-15 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 10:49:39AM +0100:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.208 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.208-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 7884d82278ab ("Linux 5.10.208-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review
2024-01-13 9:49 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-14 10:33 ` Pavel Machek
2024-01-15 4:48 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2024-01-15 9:51 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-01-15 10:23 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-01-15 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 15:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.208 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.208-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.208-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 7884d82278ab66374f212a263f44664a0da4c76c
* git describe: v5.10.206-52-g7884d82278ab
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.206-52-g7884d82278ab
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.206)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.206)
## Test result summary
total: 177915, pass: 136401, fail: 5687, skip: 35672, xfail: 155
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 222 total, 222 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 74 total, 74 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 58 total, 58 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 0 passed, 6 failed
* powerpc: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 63 total, 63 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review
2024-01-13 9:49 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 9:51 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-01-15 10:23 ` Jon Hunter
2024-01-15 11:47 ` Shreeya Patel
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-01-15 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra,
stable
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:49:39 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.208 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.208-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
68 tests: 68 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.208-rc1-g7884d82278ab
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review
2024-01-13 9:49 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 10:23 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-01-15 11:47 ` Shreeya Patel
2024-01-15 19:09 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-01-15 19:47 ` Allen
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shreeya Patel @ 2024-01-15 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, kernel,
Gustavo Padovan
On Saturday, January 13, 2024 15:19 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.208 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.208-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
KernelCI report for stable-rc/linux-5.10.y for this week :-
## stable-rc HEAD for linux-5.10.y:
Date: 2024-01-13
5.10: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=7884d82278ab66374f212a263f44664a0da4c76c
## Build failures:
No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-5.10.y commit head \o/
## Boot failures:
No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-5.10.y commit head \o/
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review
2024-01-13 9:49 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 11:47 ` Shreeya Patel
@ 2024-01-15 19:09 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-01-15 19:47 ` Allen
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-01-15 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml
On 1/13/2024 1:49 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.208 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.208-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review
2024-01-13 9:49 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.208-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 19:09 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-01-15 19:47 ` Allen
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-01-15 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.208 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.208-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread