[PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.218 release.
There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.218-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.10.218-rc1

Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
    docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21

Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
    serial: kgdboc: Fix NMI-safety problems from keyboard reset code

Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
    usb: typec: ucsi: displayport: Fix potential deadlock

Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
    drm/amdgpu: Fix possible NULL dereference in amdgpu_ras_query_error_status_helper()

Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
    btrfs: add missing mutex_unlock in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
    mptcp: ensure snd_nxt is properly initialized on connect

Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
    firmware: arm_scmi: Harden accesses to the reset domains

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
    KVM: x86: Clear "has_error_code", not "error_code", for RM exception injection

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    netlink: annotate lockless accesses to nlk->max_recvmsg_len

liqiong <liqiong@nfschina.com>
    ima: fix deadlock when traversing "ima_default_rules".

Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
    net: bcmgenet: synchronize UMAC_CMD access

Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
    net: bcmgenet: synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL access

Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
    Revert "selftests: mm: fix map_hugetlb failure on 64K page size systems"

Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
    x86/xen: Drop USERGS_SYSRET64 paravirt call

Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
    pinctrl: core: handle radix_tree_insert() errors in pinctrl_register_one_pin()


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py             |  1 -
 Makefile                                           |  4 +--
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S                          | 17 ++++++------
 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h                    |  7 -----
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h                    |  5 ----
 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h              |  8 ------
 arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_64.c                   |  2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c                         |  5 +---
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch.c                   |  4 ---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                                 | 11 ++++++--
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c                        |  1 -
 arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S                             | 21 ---------------
 arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h                             |  2 --
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c                  |  6 ++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c            |  3 +++
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c     | 12 ++++++++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.h     |  2 ++
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet_wol.c |  6 +++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmmii.c       |  4 +++
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c                             | 14 +++++++---
 drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c                        | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/displayport.c               |  4 ---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c                                 |  1 +
 net/mptcp/protocol.c                               |  2 ++
 net/netlink/af_netlink.c                           | 15 ++++++-----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c                | 29 ++++++++++++++-------
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/map_hugetlb.c           |  7 -----
 27 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 346 bytes --]

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.218 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.218 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.218-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[Dominique Martinet]

Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:42PM +0200:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.218 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.218-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Tested bc8c5267b8b7 ("Linux 5.10.218-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)

No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>

--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.218 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[Anders Roxell]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.218 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.218-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 104 total, 104 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/15] 5.10.218-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:42 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.218 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.218-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    61 tests:	61 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.218-rc1-gbc8c5267b8b7
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon