[PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.9.1-rc1

Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
    wifi: mt76: mt7915: add missing chanctx ops

Silvio Gissi <sifonsec@amazon.com>
    keys: Fix overwrite of key expiration on instantiation

Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
    dmaengine: idxd: add a write() method for applications to submit work

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
    dmaengine: idxd: add a new security check to deal with a hardware erratum

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
    VFIO: Add the SPR_DSA and SPR_IAX devices to the denylist


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                         |  4 +-
 drivers/dma/idxd/cdev.c                          | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.h                          |  3 +
 drivers/dma/idxd/init.c                          |  4 ++
 drivers/dma/idxd/registers.h                     |  3 -
 drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c                         | 27 ++++++++-
 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c |  4 ++
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                      |  2 +
 include/linux/pci_ids.h                          |  2 +
 security/keys/key.c                              |  3 +-
 10 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 5/15/24 1:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 5/15/24 01:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 5/15/24 02:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 10:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.9.1-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.9.y
* git commit: 17f066a7f99c86ac634c661e8e013b124c4726b0
* git describe: v6.9-6-g17f066a7f99c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.9.y/build/v6.9-6-g17f066a7f99c

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.9)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.9)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.9)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.9)

## Test result summary
total: 180327, pass: 155672, fail: 2287, skip: 22368, xfail: 0

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 127 total, 127 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 342 bytes --]

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:26:37 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.9:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    116 tests:	116 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.9.1-rc1-g17f066a7f99c
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.9 0/5] 6.9.1-rc1 review

[Ronald Warsow]

Hi Greg

*no* regressions here on x86_64 (RKL, Intel 11th Gen. CPU)

Thanks

Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>