* [PATCH] lib/rhashtable: cleanup fallback check in bucket_table_alloc()
@ 2024-08-06 15:39 Davidlohr Bueso
2024-08-09 7:56 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Davidlohr Bueso @ 2024-08-06 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: mhocko, 21cnbao, herbert, dave, linux-kernel, Michal Hocko
Upon allocation failure, the current check with the nofail bits
is unnecessary, and further stands in the way of discouraging
direct use of __GFP_NOFAIL. Remove this and replace with the
proper way of determining if doing a non-blocking allocation
for the nested table case.
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
---
lib/rhashtable.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
index dbbed19f8fff..6c902639728b 100644
--- a/lib/rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static struct bucket_table *bucket_table_alloc(struct rhashtable *ht,
size = nbuckets;
- if (tbl == NULL && (gfp & ~__GFP_NOFAIL) != GFP_KERNEL) {
+ if (tbl == NULL && !gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) {
tbl = nested_bucket_table_alloc(ht, nbuckets, gfp);
nbuckets = 0;
}
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] lib/rhashtable: cleanup fallback check in bucket_table_alloc()
2024-08-06 15:39 [PATCH] lib/rhashtable: cleanup fallback check in bucket_table_alloc() Davidlohr Bueso
@ 2024-08-09 7:56 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2024-08-09 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Davidlohr Bueso; +Cc: akpm, 21cnbao, herbert, linux-kernel
On Tue 06-08-24 08:39:27, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Upon allocation failure, the current check with the nofail bits
> is unnecessary, and further stands in the way of discouraging
> direct use of __GFP_NOFAIL. Remove this and replace with the
> proper way of determining if doing a non-blocking allocation
> for the nested table case.
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Thanks. This is not really something I feel qualified to ack but the
change looks good to me.
> ---
> lib/rhashtable.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
> index dbbed19f8fff..6c902639728b 100644
> --- a/lib/rhashtable.c
> +++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static struct bucket_table *bucket_table_alloc(struct rhashtable *ht,
>
> size = nbuckets;
>
> - if (tbl == NULL && (gfp & ~__GFP_NOFAIL) != GFP_KERNEL) {
> + if (tbl == NULL && !gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) {
> tbl = nested_bucket_table_alloc(ht, nbuckets, gfp);
> nbuckets = 0;
> }
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-09 7:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-06 15:39 [PATCH] lib/rhashtable: cleanup fallback check in bucket_table_alloc() Davidlohr Bueso
2024-08-09 7:56 ` Michal Hocko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox