The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1] platform/x86: Add ACPI_COMPANION() checks against NULL to probe
@ 2026-05-11 19:52 Rafael J. Wysocki
  2026-05-12  9:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-11 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilpo Järvinen
  Cc: Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI, Andy Shevchenko,
	platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel, Alex Hung,
	Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
object need to verify its presence.

Accordingly, add requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks
against NULL to multiple platform/x86 drivers where they are missing.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c            |    6 +++++-
 drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c             |    3 +++
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c               |    6 +++++-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c |    7 ++++++-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c              |    6 +++++-
 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c
@@ -48,10 +48,14 @@ static int adv_swbutton_probe(struct pla
 {
 	struct adv_swbutton *button;
 	struct input_dev *input;
-	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+	acpi_handle handle;
 	acpi_status status;
 	int error;
 
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+	if (!handle)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	button = devm_kzalloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*button), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!button)
 		return -ENOMEM;
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c
@@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ static int lis3lv02d_probe(struct platfo
 	int ret;
 
 	lis3_dev.bus_priv = ACPI_COMPANION(&device->dev);
+	if (!lis3_dev.bus_priv)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	lis3_dev.init = lis3lv02d_acpi_init;
 	lis3_dev.read = lis3lv02d_acpi_read;
 	lis3_dev.write = lis3lv02d_acpi_write;
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
@@ -688,12 +688,16 @@ static bool button_array_present(struct
 
 static int intel_hid_probe(struct platform_device *device)
 {
-	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
 	unsigned long long mode, dummy;
 	struct intel_hid_priv *priv;
+	acpi_handle handle;
 	acpi_status status;
 	int err;
 
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+	if (!handle)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	intel_hid_init_dsm(handle);
 
 	if (!intel_hid_evaluate_method(handle, INTEL_HID_DSM_HDMM_FN, &mode)) {
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c
@@ -245,15 +245,20 @@ static void sar_get_data(int reg, struct
 static int sar_probe(struct platform_device *device)
 {
 	struct wwan_sar_context *context;
+	acpi_handle handle;
 	int reg;
 	int result;
 
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+	if (!handle)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	context = kzalloc_obj(*context);
 	if (!context)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	context->sar_device = device;
-	context->handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+	context->handle = handle;
 	dev_set_drvdata(&device->dev, context);
 
 	result = guid_parse(SAR_DSM_UUID, &context->guid);
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
@@ -275,12 +275,16 @@ static bool intel_vbtn_has_switches(acpi
 
 static int intel_vbtn_probe(struct platform_device *device)
 {
-	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
 	bool dual_accel, has_buttons, has_switches;
 	struct intel_vbtn_priv *priv;
+	acpi_handle handle;
 	acpi_status status;
 	int err;
 
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
+	if (!handle)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	dual_accel = dual_accel_detect();
 	has_buttons = acpi_has_method(handle, "VBDL");
 	has_switches = intel_vbtn_has_switches(handle, dual_accel);




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1] platform/x86: Add ACPI_COMPANION() checks against NULL to probe
  2026-05-11 19:52 [PATCH v1] platform/x86: Add ACPI_COMPANION() checks against NULL to probe Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2026-05-12  9:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
  2026-05-12 10:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2026-05-12  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI, Andy Shevchenko,
	platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel, Alex Hung,
	Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao

On Mon, 11 May 2026, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
> its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
> platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
> object need to verify its presence.
> 
> Accordingly, add requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks
> against NULL to multiple platform/x86 drivers where they are missing.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Don't these fixes need fixes tags?

So this part has the changes that are needed pre-7.1?
And the other is for changes going into 7.1?

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c            |    6 +++++-
>  drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c             |    3 +++
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c               |    6 +++++-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c |    7 ++++++-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c              |    6 +++++-
>  5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/adv_swbutton.c
> @@ -48,10 +48,14 @@ static int adv_swbutton_probe(struct pla
>  {
>  	struct adv_swbutton *button;
>  	struct input_dev *input;
> -	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
> +	acpi_handle handle;
>  	acpi_status status;
>  	int error;
>  
> +	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
> +	if (!handle)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	button = devm_kzalloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*button), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!button)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp/hp_accel.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ static int lis3lv02d_probe(struct platfo
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	lis3_dev.bus_priv = ACPI_COMPANION(&device->dev);
> +	if (!lis3_dev.bus_priv)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	lis3_dev.init = lis3lv02d_acpi_init;
>  	lis3_dev.read = lis3lv02d_acpi_read;
>  	lis3_dev.write = lis3lv02d_acpi_write;
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/hid.c
> @@ -688,12 +688,16 @@ static bool button_array_present(struct
>  
>  static int intel_hid_probe(struct platform_device *device)
>  {
> -	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
>  	unsigned long long mode, dummy;
>  	struct intel_hid_priv *priv;
> +	acpi_handle handle;
>  	acpi_status status;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
> +	if (!handle)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	intel_hid_init_dsm(handle);
>  
>  	if (!intel_hid_evaluate_method(handle, INTEL_HID_DSM_HDMM_FN, &mode)) {
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int1092/intel_sar.c
> @@ -245,15 +245,20 @@ static void sar_get_data(int reg, struct
>  static int sar_probe(struct platform_device *device)
>  {
>  	struct wwan_sar_context *context;
> +	acpi_handle handle;
>  	int reg;
>  	int result;
>  
> +	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
> +	if (!handle)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	context = kzalloc_obj(*context);
>  	if (!context)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	context->sar_device = device;
> -	context->handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
> +	context->handle = handle;
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&device->dev, context);
>  
>  	result = guid_parse(SAR_DSM_UUID, &context->guid);
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vbtn.c
> @@ -275,12 +275,16 @@ static bool intel_vbtn_has_switches(acpi
>  
>  static int intel_vbtn_probe(struct platform_device *device)
>  {
> -	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
>  	bool dual_accel, has_buttons, has_switches;
>  	struct intel_vbtn_priv *priv;
> +	acpi_handle handle;
>  	acpi_status status;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->dev);
> +	if (!handle)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	dual_accel = dual_accel_detect();
>  	has_buttons = acpi_has_method(handle, "VBDL");
>  	has_switches = intel_vbtn_has_switches(handle, dual_accel);
> 
> 
> 

-- 
 i.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1] platform/x86: Add ACPI_COMPANION() checks against NULL to probe
  2026-05-12  9:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
@ 2026-05-12 10:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2026-05-12 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ilpo Järvinen
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Hans de Goede, LKML, Linux ACPI,
	Andy Shevchenko, platform-driver-x86, Andrea Ho, Eric Piel,
	Alex Hung, Shravan Sudhakar, AceLan Kao

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:56 AM Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 May 2026, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match
> > its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so
> > platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion
> > object need to verify its presence.
> >
> > Accordingly, add requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks
> > against NULL to multiple platform/x86 drivers where they are missing.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Don't these fixes need fixes tags?

Ideally.

> So this part has the changes that are needed pre-7.1?
> And the other is for changes going into 7.1?

That was the idea, but since you want them to be split per driver, I'm
going to send two patch series.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-12 10:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-11 19:52 [PATCH v1] platform/x86: Add ACPI_COMPANION() checks against NULL to probe Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12  9:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-12 10:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox