* [PATCH v3] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts
@ 2025-05-16 18:30 Brian Norris
2025-05-17 16:13 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2025-05-16 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Tsai Sung-Fu, linux-kernel, Douglas Anderson, Brian Norris
There have been a few bugs and/or misunderstandings about the reference
counting, and startup/shutdown behaviors in the IRQ core and related CPU
hotplug code. These 4 test cases try to capture a few interesting cases.
* irq_disable_depth_test: basic request/disable/enable sequence
* irq_free_disabled_test: request/disable/free/re-request sequence -
this catches errors on previous revisions of my work
* irq_cpuhotplug_test: exercises managed-affinity IRQ + CPU hotplug.
This captures a problematic test case that I've fixed.
This test requires CONFIG_SMP and a hotpluggable CPU#1.
* irq_shutdown_depth_test: exercises similar behavior from
irq_cpuhotplug_test, but directly using irq_*() APIs instead of going
through CPU hotplug. This still requires CONFIG_SMP, because
managed-affinity is stubbed out (and not all APIs are even present)
without it.
Note the use of 'imply SMP': ARCH=um doesn't support SMP, and kunit is
often exercised there. Thus, 'imply' will force SMP on where possible
(such as ARCH=x86_64), but leave it off where it's not.
Behavior on various SMP and ARCH configurations:
$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'irq_test_cases*' --arch x86_64 --qemu_args '-smp 2'
[...]
[11:12:24] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 4
$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'irq_test_cases*' --arch x86_64
[...]
[11:13:27] [SKIPPED] irq_cpuhotplug_test
[11:13:27] ================= [PASSED] irq_test_cases ==================
[11:13:27] ============================================================
[11:13:27] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 3, skipped: 1
# default: ARCH=um
$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'irq_test_cases*'
[11:14:26] [SKIPPED] irq_shutdown_depth_test
[11:14:26] [SKIPPED] irq_cpuhotplug_test
[11:14:26] ================= [PASSED] irq_test_cases ==================
[11:14:26] ============================================================
[11:14:26] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 2, skipped: 2
Without commit 788019eb559f ("genirq: Retain disable depth for managed
interrupts across CPU hotplug"), we fail as follows:
[11:18:55] =============== irq_test_cases (4 subtests) ================
[11:18:55] [PASSED] irq_disable_depth_test
[11:18:55] [PASSED] irq_free_disabled_test
[11:18:55] # irq_shutdown_depth_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:147
[11:18:55] Expected desc->depth == 1, but
[11:18:55] desc->depth == 0 (0x0)
[11:18:55] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[11:18:55] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 26
[11:18:55] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 36 at kernel/irq/manage.c:792 __enable_irq+0x36/0x60
...
[11:18:55] [FAILED] irq_shutdown_depth_test
[11:18:55] #1
[11:18:55] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:202
[11:18:55] Expected irqd_is_activated(data) to be false, but is true
[11:18:55] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:203
[11:18:55] Expected irqd_is_started(data) to be false, but is true
[11:18:55] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:204
[11:18:55] Expected desc->depth == 1, but
[11:18:55] desc->depth == 0 (0x0)
[11:18:55] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[11:18:55] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 27
[11:18:55] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 38 at kernel/irq/manage.c:792 __enable_irq+0x36/0x60
...
[11:18:55] [FAILED] irq_cpuhotplug_test
[11:18:55] # module: irq_test
[11:18:55] # irq_test_cases: pass:2 fail:2 skip:0 total:4
[11:18:55] # Totals: pass:2 fail:2 skip:0 total:4
[11:18:55] ================= [FAILED] irq_test_cases ==================
[11:18:55] ============================================================
[11:18:55] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 2, failed: 2
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v3:
* send as standalone patch, since dependent patch was merged
* make IRQ_KUNIT_TEST bool; we depend on a few internal functions that
are not exported to modules. Reported:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505152136.y04AHovS-lkp@intel.com/
Changes in v2:
* add request_irq()/disable_irq()/free_irq()/request_irq() test
sequence
* clean up more resources in tests
* move tests to patch 2 (i.e., after bugs are fixed and tests pass)
* adapt to irq_startup_managed() (new API)
kernel/irq/Kconfig | 11 ++
kernel/irq/Makefile | 1 +
kernel/irq/irq_test.c | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 241 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 kernel/irq/irq_test.c
diff --git a/kernel/irq/Kconfig b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
index 3f02a0e45254..ddc34fe47e55 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
@@ -144,6 +144,17 @@ config GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS
config GENERIC_IRQ_KEXEC_CLEAR_VM_FORWARD
bool
+config IRQ_KUNIT_TEST
+ bool "KUnit tests for IRQ management APIs" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ imply SMP
+ help
+ This option enables KUnit tests for the IRQ subsystem API. These are
+ only for development and testing, not for regular kernel use cases.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
+
endmenu
config GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
diff --git a/kernel/irq/Makefile b/kernel/irq/Makefile
index c0f44c06d69d..6ab3a4055667 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/irq/Makefile
@@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_IPI_MUX) += ipi-mux.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += affinity.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS) += debugfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR) += matrix.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_KUNIT_TEST) += irq_test.o
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irq_test.c b/kernel/irq/irq_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5161b56a12f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/irq/irq_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+
+
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdesc.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include "internals.h"
+
+static irqreturn_t noop_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void noop(struct irq_data *data) { }
+static unsigned int noop_ret(struct irq_data *data) { return 0; }
+
+static int noop_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *dest,
+ bool force)
+{
+ irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, dest);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip fake_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "fake",
+ .irq_startup = noop_ret,
+ .irq_shutdown = noop,
+ .irq_enable = noop,
+ .irq_disable = noop,
+ .irq_ack = noop,
+ .irq_mask = noop,
+ .irq_unmask = noop,
+ .irq_set_affinity = noop_affinity,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
+};
+
+static void irq_disable_depth_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ int virq, ret;
+
+ virq = irq_domain_alloc_descs(-1, 1, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, virq, 0);
+
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &dummy_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(virq);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, desc, NULL);
+
+ ret = request_irq(virq, noop_handler, 0, "test_irq", NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ disable_irq(virq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 1);
+
+ enable_irq(virq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ free_irq(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static void irq_free_disabled_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ int virq, ret;
+
+ virq = irq_domain_alloc_descs(-1, 1, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, virq, 0);
+
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &dummy_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(virq);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, desc, NULL);
+
+ ret = request_irq(virq, noop_handler, 0, "test_irq", NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ disable_irq(virq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 1);
+
+ free_irq(virq, NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, desc->depth, 1);
+
+ ret = request_irq(virq, noop_handler, 0, "test_irq", NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ free_irq(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static void irq_shutdown_depth_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ struct irq_data *data;
+ int virq, ret;
+ struct irq_affinity_desc affinity = {
+ .is_managed = 1,
+ .mask = CPU_MASK_ALL,
+ };
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
+ kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_SMP for managed shutdown");
+
+ virq = irq_domain_alloc_descs(-1, 1, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE, &affinity);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, virq, 0);
+
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &dummy_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(virq);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, desc, NULL);
+
+ data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, data, NULL);
+
+ ret = request_irq(virq, noop_handler, 0, "test_irq", NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_is_activated(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_is_started(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_affinity_is_managed(data));
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ disable_irq(virq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 1);
+
+ irq_shutdown_and_deactivate(desc);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, irqd_is_activated(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, irqd_is_started(data));
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, irq_activate(desc), 0);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ irq_startup_managed(desc);
+#endif
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 1);
+
+ enable_irq(virq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ free_irq(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static void irq_cpuhotplug_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ struct irq_data *data;
+ int virq, ret;
+ struct irq_affinity_desc affinity = {
+ .is_managed = 1,
+ };
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
+ kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_SMP for CPU hotplug");
+ if (!get_cpu_device(1))
+ kunit_skip(test, "requires more than 1 CPU for CPU hotplug");
+ if (!cpu_is_hotpluggable(1))
+ kunit_skip(test, "CPU 1 must be hotpluggable");
+
+ cpumask_copy(&affinity.mask, cpumask_of(1));
+
+ virq = irq_domain_alloc_descs(-1, 1, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE, &affinity);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, virq, 0);
+
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &fake_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(virq);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, desc, NULL);
+
+ data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, data, NULL);
+
+ ret = request_irq(virq, noop_handler, 0, "test_irq", NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_is_activated(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_is_started(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_affinity_is_managed(data));
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ disable_irq(virq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 1);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, remove_cpu(1), 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, irqd_is_activated(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, irqd_is_started(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, desc->depth, 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_cpu(1), 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, irqd_is_activated(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, irqd_is_started(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 1);
+
+ enable_irq(virq);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_is_activated(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, irqd_is_started(data));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, desc->depth, 0);
+
+ free_irq(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case irq_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(irq_disable_depth_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(irq_free_disabled_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(irq_shutdown_depth_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(irq_cpuhotplug_test),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite irq_test_suite = {
+ .name = "irq_test_cases",
+ .test_cases = irq_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(irq_test_suite);
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IRQ unit test suite");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.49.0.1101.gccaa498523-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts
2025-05-16 18:30 [PATCH v3] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts Brian Norris
@ 2025-05-17 16:13 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-19 22:59 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-05-17 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris, Thomas Gleixner
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Tsai Sung-Fu, linux-kernel, Douglas Anderson,
Brian Norris
Hi Brian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on tip/irq/core]
[also build test ERROR on next-20250516]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Brian-Norris/genirq-Add-kunit-tests-for-depth-counts/20250517-023519
base: tip/irq/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250516183213.848182-1-briannorris%40chromium.org
patch subject: [PATCH v3] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts
config: arm64-randconfig-001-20250517 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250517/202505172307.yTjulMhx-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250517/202505172307.yTjulMhx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505172307.yTjulMhx-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format
>>> referenced by irq_test.c:54 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:54)
>>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_disable_depth_test) in archive vmlinux.a
>>> referenced by irq_test.c:54 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:54)
>>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_disable_depth_test) in archive vmlinux.a
>>> referenced by irq_test.c:81 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:81)
>>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_free_disabled_test) in archive vmlinux.a
>>> referenced 5 more times
--
>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kunit_try_catch_throw
>>> referenced by irq_test.c:0 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:0)
>>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_cpuhotplug_test) in archive vmlinux.a
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts
2025-05-17 16:13 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-05-19 22:59 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2025-05-19 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Tsai Sung-Fu, linux-kernel,
Douglas Anderson
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 12:13:47AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> config: arm64-randconfig-001-20250517 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250517/202505172307.yTjulMhx-lkp@intel.com/config)
Ugh, that config manages to have this combination:
CONFIG_IRQ_KUNIT_TEST=y
CONFIG_KUNIT=m
I assumed that "IRQ_KUNIT_TEST depends on KUNIT" would rule out that
combination, but I see that's not true. I feel like I relearn Kconfig's
language every time I step outside the simplest of dependencies.
> >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format
> >>> referenced by irq_test.c:54 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:54)
> >>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_disable_depth_test) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by irq_test.c:54 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:54)
> >>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_disable_depth_test) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced by irq_test.c:81 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:81)
> >>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_free_disabled_test) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>> referenced 5 more times
> --
> >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: kunit_try_catch_throw
> >>> referenced by irq_test.c:0 (kernel/irq/irq_test.c:0)
> >>> kernel/irq/irq_test.o:(irq_cpuhotplug_test) in archive vmlinux.a
I guess I'll need to squash this in:
--- a/kernel/irq/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ config GENERIC_IRQ_KEXEC_CLEAR_VM_FORWARD
config IRQ_KUNIT_TEST
bool "KUnit tests for IRQ management APIs" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
- depends on KUNIT
+ depends on KUNIT=y
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
imply SMP
help
I'll sit on it and send v4 eventually.
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-19 22:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-16 18:30 [PATCH v3] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts Brian Norris
2025-05-17 16:13 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-19 22:59 ` Brian Norris
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox