From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>,
Srikanth Aithal <Srikanth.Aithal@amd.com>,
Suneeth D <Suneeth.D@amd.com>, Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix NULL pointer access to mm_struct durng task swap
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 13:51:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGZuuxxTI6tFOTWK@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6b9e035-5227-4aab-a0cb-0ab6e4d57f9a@intel.com>
On Thu 03-07-25 17:37:23, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 7/3/2025 3:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 03-07-25 00:32:47, Chen Yu wrote:
[...]
> > > +
> > > + if (p->mm)
> > > + count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
> > > + }
> >
> > Why are you testing for p->mm here? Isn't PF_EXITING test sufficient?
> > A robust way to guarantee non-NULL mm against races when a task is
> > exiting is find_lock_task_mm. Probably too heavy weight for this path.
>
> I suppose we might only need to grab task_lock(p), check if its mm
> pointer is NULL. If yes, we skip the update of memcg event without
> scanning for a non-NULL mm within the process(as find_lock_task_mm()
> does)? If the mm is non-NULL, we update the memcg event with task_lock(p)
> hold and releases it later.
Why not use find_lock_task_mm if task_lock is acceptable for this code
path?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 16:32 [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix NULL pointer access to mm_struct durng task swap Chen Yu
2025-07-02 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2025-07-03 9:24 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 7:18 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-03 9:37 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 11:51 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2025-07-03 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 7:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-03 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 12:01 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-03 12:04 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 12:20 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-03 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 13:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-04 5:57 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 13:57 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-03 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 23:35 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-04 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGZuuxxTI6tFOTWK@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=Srikanth.Aithal@amd.com \
--cc=Suneeth.D@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jhladky@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox