From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>,
Srikanth Aithal <Srikanth.Aithal@amd.com>,
Suneeth D <Suneeth.D@amd.com>, Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix NULL pointer access to mm_struct durng task swap
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 14:01:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGZxFRVxHouLaMPg@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250703115006.GT1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu 03-07-25 13:50:06, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > But thinking about this some more, this would be racy same as the
> > PF_EXITING check. This is not my area but is this performance sensitive
> > path that couldn't live with the proper find_lock_task_mm?
>
> find_lock_task_mm() seems eminently unsuitable for accounting --
> iterating the task group is insane.
>
> Looking at this, the mm_struct lifetimes suck.. task_struct reference
> doesn't help, rcu doesn't help :-(
>
> Also, whatever the solution it needs to be inside this count_memcg_*()
> nonsense, because nobody wants this overhead, esp. not for something
> daft like accounting.
>
> My primary desire at this point is to just revert the patch that caused
> this. Accounting just isn't worth it. Esp. not since there is already a
> tracepoint in this path -- people that want to count crap can very well
> get their numbers from that.
I would tend to agree with this. Doing the accounting race free on a
remote task is nasty and if this is a rare event that could be avoided
then it should be just dropped than racy and oops prone.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 16:32 [PATCH] sched/numa: Fix NULL pointer access to mm_struct durng task swap Chen Yu
2025-07-02 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2025-07-03 9:24 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 7:18 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-03 9:37 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 11:51 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-03 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 7:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-03 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 12:01 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2025-07-03 12:04 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 12:20 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-03 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 13:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-04 5:57 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-03 13:57 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-03 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-03 23:35 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-04 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGZxFRVxHouLaMPg@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=Srikanth.Aithal@amd.com \
--cc=Suneeth.D@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jhladky@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox