The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/34] x86/cacheinfo: Use parsed CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006)
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 19:00:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKNcE7D_s9D7spvR@lx-t490> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9620899cc52cd45c090c939898be8787ff84df6.camel@infradead.org>

Hi!

On Mon, 18 Aug 2025, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> How about automatically building the cast into the macro invocation...
>
> #define cpuid_leaf(c, l) ((struct cpuid_leaf_ ## l *)__cpuid_leaf(c, l)
> #define cpuid_lead_index(c, l, i) ((struct cpuid_leaf_ ## l ## _ ## i) __cpuid_leaf_index(c, l, i)
>

There are zero casts needed by this model.  From patch 07/34 ("x86/cpuid:
Introduce a centralized CPUID data model"), the access CPUID parser APIs
just dissolve into:

    const struct leaf_0x7_0 *l7_0;
    const struct leaf_0x7_1 *l7_1;

    l7_0 = cpuid_subleaf(c, 0x7, 0);
                         |   |   └────────┐
                         |   └─────────┐  |
                         *             *  *
                        &c.cpuid.leaf_0x7_0[0]

    l7_1 = cpuid_subleaf(c, 0x7, 1);
                         |   |   └────────┐
                         |   └─────────┐  |
                         *             *  *
                        &c.cpuid.leaf_0x7_1[0]

where, for example, the data type of 'c.cpuid.leaf_0x7_0[0]' is native
'struct leaf_0x7_0', and so on.

The per-CPU CPUID table(s) are built in a /fully-typed/ form:

    struct leaf_0x0_0		leaf_0x0_0[1];
    struct leaf_0x1_0		leaf_0x1_0[1];
    struct leaf_0x2_0		leaf_0x2_0[1];
    struct leaf_0x4_0		leaf_0x4_0[8];
    struct leaf_0x16_0		leaf_0x16_0[1];
    struct leaf_0x80000000_0	leaf_0x80000000_0[1];
    struct leaf_0x80000005_0	leaf_0x80000005_0[1];
    struct leaf_0x80000006_0	leaf_0x80000006_0[1];
    struct leaf_0x8000001d_0	leaf_0x8000001d_0[8];

Then, the exported CPUID parser APIs do some CPP tokenization magic to
access such fully-typed data -- no casting needed.

The only exception is raw EAX->EDX register access:

    /**
     * cpuid_leaf_regs() - Access parsed CPUID data in raw format
     * @_cpuinfo:	CPU capability structure reference ('struct cpuinfo_x86')
     * @_leaf:		CPUID leaf, in compile-time 0xN format
     *
     * Similar to cpuid_leaf(), but returns a raw 'struct cpuid_regs' pointer to
     * the parsed CPUID data instead of a "typed" <cpuid/leaf_types.h> pointer.
     */
    #define cpuid_leaf_regs(_cpuinfo, _leaf)				\
	((struct cpuid_regs *)(cpuid_leaf(_cpuinfo, _leaf)))

But the usage of this raw-access API is very limited.  This is by design,
as one of the purpose of this work was to ensure type safety and avoid
call-site bit fiddling.

Thanks!

--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-15  7:01 [PATCH v4 00/34] x86: Introduce a centralized CPUID data model Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] x86/cpuid: Remove transitional <asm/cpuid.h> header Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15 10:11   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15 15:22   ` tip-bot2 for Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] ASoC: Intel: avs: Include CPUID header at file scope Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-18 14:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-18 15:14     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] treewide: Explicitly include the x86 CPUID headers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] x86/cpu: <asm/processor.h>: Do not include the CPUID API header Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] x86/cpuid: Rename cpuid_leaf()/cpuid_subleaf() APIs Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] x86/cpuid: Introduce <asm/cpuid/leaf_types.h> Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-25 14:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-08-25 14:56     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] x86/cpuid: Introduce a centralized CPUID data model Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15 15:34   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 13:49     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-18 18:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 19:54         ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-18 21:29           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-19 13:10             ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] x86/cpuid: Introduce a centralized CPUID parser Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] x86/cpu: Use parsed CPUID(0x0) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] x86/lib: Add CPUID(0x1) CPU family and model calculation Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] x86/cpu: Use parsed CPUID(0x1) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] x86/cpuid: Parse CPUID(0x80000000) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] x86/cpu: Use parsed CPUID(0x80000000) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 14/34] x86/cpuid: Introduce a CPUID leaf x86 vendor table Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] x86/cpuid: Introduce CPUID parser debugfs interface Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] x86/cpuid: Parse CPUID(0x2) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] x86/cpuid: Warn once on invalid CPUID(0x2) iteration count Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] x86/cpuid: Introduce parsed CPUID(0x2) API Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] x86/cpu: Use parsed CPUID(0x2) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] x86/cacheinfo: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] x86/cpuid: Remove direct CPUID(0x2) query API Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 22/34] x86/cpuid: Parse 'deterministic cache parameters' CPUID leaves Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] x86/cacheinfo: Pass a 'struct cpuinfo_x86' refrence to CPUID(0x4) code Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] x86/cacheinfo: Use parsed CPUID(0x4) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] x86/cacheinfo: Use parsed CPUID(0x8000001d) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 26/34] x86/cpuid: Parse CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] x86/cacheinfo: Use auto-generated data types Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] x86/cacheinfo: Use parsed CPUID(0x80000005) and CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15 15:25   ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-18 15:38     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-18 15:52     ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-18 17:00       ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] x86/amd_nb: Trickle down 'struct cpuinfo_x86' reference Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-18  2:54   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-18 14:47     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] x86/cpuid: Use parsed CPUID(0x80000006) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] x86/cpu: Rescan CPUID table after PSN disable Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] x86/cpu: Rescan CPUID table after unlocking full CPUID range Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] x86/cpuid: Parse CPUID(0x16) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-15  7:02 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] x86/tsc: Use parsed CPUID(0x16) Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-08-16  9:59 ` [PATCH v4 00/34] x86: Introduce a centralized CPUID data model David Woodhouse
2025-08-18 16:37   ` Ahmed S. Darwish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKNcE7D_s9D7spvR@lx-t490 \
    --to=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox