* [PATCH 5.10 022/122] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: Fix dma_map_sg error check
2025-09-30 14:45 [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-30 14:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-30 17:23 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-09-30 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger,
Vignesh Raghavendra, Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue,
Philipp Zabel, Christophe Kerello, Cai Huoqing, linux-mtd,
linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Jack Wang,
Sasha Levin
5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
[ Upstream commit 43b81c2a3e6e07915151045aa13a6e8a9bd64419 ]
dma_map_sg return 0 on error, in case of error return -EIO.
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Cc: Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220819060801.10443-5-jinpu.wang@ionos.com
Stable-dep-of: 513c40e59d5a ("mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: avoid overlapping mappings on ECC buffer")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
@@ -858,8 +858,8 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_xfer(struct na
ret = dma_map_sg(nfc->dev, nfc->dma_data_sg.sgl,
eccsteps, dma_data_dir);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ if (!ret)
+ return -EIO;
desc_data = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(dma_ch, nfc->dma_data_sg.sgl,
eccsteps, dma_transfer_dir,
@@ -889,8 +889,10 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_xfer(struct na
ret = dma_map_sg(nfc->dev, nfc->dma_ecc_sg.sgl,
eccsteps, dma_data_dir);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (!ret) {
+ ret = -EIO;
goto err_unmap_data;
+ }
desc_ecc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(nfc->dma_ecc_ch,
nfc->dma_ecc_sg.sgl,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:45 [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH 5.10 022/122] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: Fix dma_map_sg error check Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-30 17:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-30 18:51 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-09-30 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor,
hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/30/25 07:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:45 [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH 5.10 022/122] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: Fix dma_map_sg error check Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-30 17:23 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-09-30 18:51 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] " Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-09-30 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 5.10.245-rc1-00123-g9abf794d1d5c #96 SMP Tue Sep 30 16:03:28 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:45 [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 18:51 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-09-30 19:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-10-01 10:23 ` Mark Brown
` (2 more replies)
2025-09-30 23:05 ` Dominique Martinet
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Dan Carpenter, Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block,
Anders Roxell, Ben Copeland
On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
ltp-syscalls
- fanotify13
- fanotify14
- fanotify15
- fanotify16
- fanotify21
- landlock04
- ioctl_ficlone02
Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
failed with exit code 1
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
We are investigating and running bisections.
### Test log
tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
making filesystem (use -I to override)
tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c285a2f01d69
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bc2473c90fca
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c45beebfde34a
Summary:
passed 72
failed 0
broken 1
skipped 0
warnings 0
<8>[ 868.434017] <LAVA_SIGNAL_ENDTC fanotify13>
## Build logs
* Test details:
https://regressions.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.244-123-g9abf794d1d5c/ltp-syscalls/fanotify13/
* Test log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/api/testruns/30062041/log_file/
--
Linaro LKFT
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] " Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-10-01 10:23 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-01 10:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-10-01 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, achill, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell,
Ben Copeland
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
>
> First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
>
> ltp-syscalls
> - fanotify13
> - fanotify14
> - fanotify15
> - fanotify16
> - fanotify21
> - landlock04
> - ioctl_ficlone02
> Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> failed with exit code 1
I'm also seeing some issues with fcntl34, but that's a timeout so I'm
not convinced it's real. The bisect looked like noise.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] " Naresh Kamboju
2025-10-01 10:23 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-10-01 10:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2025-10-01 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
Guenter Roeck, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, Pavel Machek,
Jon Hunter, Florian Fainelli, Sudip Mukherjee, rwarsow,
Conor Dooley, hargar, Mark Brown, achill, Dan Carpenter,
linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell, Benjamin Copeland
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, at 21:27, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> We are investigating and running bisections.
>
> ### Test log
> tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
> tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra
> opts=''
> mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
> making filesystem (use -I to override)
> tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
The error message indicates that the loop device contains
existing data and mkfs.vfat refuses to overwrite it, which
would be part of your test environment.
Can you try adding the suggested '-I' flag to the mkfs.vfat
invocation so it overrides the warning?
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] " Naresh Kamboju
2025-10-01 10:23 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-01 10:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-01 12:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-10-01 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Dan Carpenter, Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block,
Anders Roxell, Ben Copeland
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
>
> First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
>
> ltp-syscalls
> - fanotify13
> - fanotify14
> - fanotify15
> - fanotify16
> - fanotify21
> - landlock04
> - ioctl_ficlone02
>
> Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> failed with exit code 1
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> We are investigating and running bisections.
>
> ### Test log
> tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
> tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
> mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
> making filesystem (use -I to override)
> tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
> HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c285a2f01d69
You are not missing this "fix".
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bc2473c90fca
You are missing that one, but why is a overlayfs commit being cared
about for vfat?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c45beebfde34a
Another overlayfs patch that is not backported that far. Again, why is
this a hint for vfat?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-10-01 12:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-01 12:22 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2025-10-01 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell,
Ben Copeland
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:50:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> > > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> > Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
> >
> > First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
> >
> > ltp-syscalls
> > - fanotify13
> > - fanotify14
> > - fanotify15
> > - fanotify16
> > - fanotify21
> > - landlock04
> > - ioctl_ficlone02
> >
> > Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> > failed with exit code 1
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > We are investigating and running bisections.
> >
> > ### Test log
> > tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
> > tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
> > mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
> > making filesystem (use -I to override)
> > tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
> > HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c285a2f01d69
>
> You are not missing this "fix".
>
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bc2473c90fca
>
> You are missing that one, but why is a overlayfs commit being cared
> about for vfat?
>
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c45beebfde34a
>
> Another overlayfs patch that is not backported that far. Again, why is
> this a hint for vfat?
That's test output, not something we added. LTP tests can have a list
of suggested commits. LTP doesn't know what kernel you're running, it
just prints out the list of commits.
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify13.c#L436
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-10-01 12:10 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2025-10-01 12:22 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-10-01 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell,
Ben Copeland
On Wed, 1 Oct 2025 at 17:40, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:50:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> > > > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> > > Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
> > >
> > > First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
> > >
> > > ltp-syscalls
> > > - fanotify13
> > > - fanotify14
> > > - fanotify15
> > > - fanotify16
> > > - fanotify21
> > > - landlock04
> > > - ioctl_ficlone02
> > >
> > > Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> > > failed with exit code 1
I have re-tested for 12 times and reported test failures are getting
passed 12 times.
However, I will keep monitoring test results.
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:45 [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] " Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-30 23:05 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-10-01 9:11 ` Jon Hunter
2025-10-03 6:58 ` Pavel Machek
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2025-09-30 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 04:45:31PM +0200:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 9abf794d1d5c ("Linux 5.10.245-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:45 [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-30 23:05 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2025-10-01 9:11 ` Jon Hunter
2025-10-03 6:58 ` Pavel Machek
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-10-01 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 16:45:31 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
67 tests: 67 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.245-rc1-g9abf794d1d5c
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 14:45 [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-01 9:11 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-10-03 6:58 ` Pavel Machek
6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-10-03 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
In cooperation with DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich,
Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread