From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:irq/drivers 11/18] drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:419:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'imx_mu_probe'; did you mean 'imx_mu_write'?
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 17:16:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPEMRBTVR6rT4MzJ@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 10:47:56PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq/drivers
> head: 45f8fdcfbf4e49075172cf1a3fd812b90160e903
> commit: 4265aed28d7de2a643b8e441bc25344f421f2f78 [11/18] irqchip: Pass platform device to platform drivers
> config: arm-randconfig-004-20251016 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c: In function 'imx_mu_imx7ulp_probe':
> >> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:419:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'imx_mu_probe'; did you mean 'imx_mu_write'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 419 | return imx_mu_probe(pdev, parent, &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> | imx_mu_write
> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c: At top level:
> >> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:299:12: warning: 'imx_mu_of_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 299 | static int imx_mu_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct device_node *parent,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thomas, this looks like a bad edit on your part where you renamed
imx_mu_probe() back to imx_mu_init() when you removed a line break from
the function header.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 14:47 [tip:irq/drivers 11/18] drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:419:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'imx_mu_probe'; did you mean 'imx_mu_write'? kernel test robot
2025-10-16 15:16 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-10-16 15:20 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPEMRBTVR6rT4MzJ@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox