From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
david decotigny <decot@googlers.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, asantostc@gmail.com,
efault@gmx.de, calvin@wbinvd.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
jv@jvosburgh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v9 4/4] selftest: netcons: add test for netconsole over bonded interfaces
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 10:07:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQ3ExWwuiiN0xyBE@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106-netconsole_torture-v9-4-f73cd147c13c@debian.org>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 07:56:50AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> This patch adds a selftest that verifies netconsole functionality
> over bonded network interfaces using netdevsim. It sets up two bonded
> interfaces acting as transmit (TX) and receive (RX) ends, placed in
> separate network namespaces. The test sends kernel log messages and
> verifies that they are properly received on the bonded RX interfaces
> with both IPv4 and IPv6, and using basic and extended netconsole
> formats.
>
> This patchset aims to test a long-standing netpoll subsystem where
> netpoll has multiple users. (in this case netconsole and bonding). A
> similar selftest has been discussed in [1] and [2].
>
> This test also tries to enable bonding and netpoll in different order,
> just to guarantee that all the possibilities are exercised.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250905-netconsole_torture-v3-0-875c7febd316@debian.org/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/96b940137a50e5c387687bb4f57de8b0435a653f.1404857349.git.decot@googlers.com/ [2]
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Thanks, my understanding is that this address Paolo's review of v7.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
...
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/sh/lib_netcons.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/lib/sh/lib_netcons.sh
...
> @@ -137,15 +145,17 @@ function _create_dynamic_target() {
> then
> echo 1 > "${NCPATH}"/extended
> fi
> +}
>
> +function create_and_enable_dynamic_target() {
> + _create_dynamic_target "${FORMAT}" "${NCPATH}"
> echo 1 > "${NCPATH}"/enabled
> -
> }
>
> function create_dynamic_target() {
> local FORMAT=${1:-"extended"}
> local NCPATH=${2:-"$NETCONS_PATH"}
> - _create_dynamic_target "${FORMAT}" "${NCPATH}"
> + create_and_enable_dynamic_target "${FORMAT}" "${NCPATH}"
Sorry for not noticing this when I looked over v8.
It's not that important and I don't think it should block progress.
create_and_enable_dynamic_target() seems to only be used here.
If so, perhaps the 'enabled' line could simply be added to
create_dynamic_target() instead of creating adding
create_and_enable_dynamic_target().
>
> # This will make sure that the kernel was able to
> # load the netconsole driver configuration. The console message
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 15:56 [PATCH net v9 0/4] net: netpoll: fix memory leak and add comprehensive selftests Breno Leitao
2025-11-06 15:56 ` [PATCH net v9 1/4] net: netpoll: fix incorrect refcount handling causing incorrect cleanup Breno Leitao
2025-11-06 15:56 ` [PATCH net v9 2/4] selftest: netcons: refactor target creation Breno Leitao
2025-11-06 15:56 ` [PATCH net v9 3/4] selftest: netcons: create a torture test Breno Leitao
2025-11-06 15:56 ` [PATCH net v9 4/4] selftest: netcons: add test for netconsole over bonded interfaces Breno Leitao
2025-11-07 10:07 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-11-07 13:55 ` Breno Leitao
2025-11-10 17:25 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQ3ExWwuiiN0xyBE@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=asantostc@gmail.com \
--cc=calvin@wbinvd.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decot@googlers.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox