From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
To: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() bug in __debug_object_init()
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:39:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRHrGOKBi5UrlyGf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110075746.1680-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Hi Haotian,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 03:57:46PM +0800, Haotian Zhang wrote:
> The lookup_object_or_alloc() returns error pointers on failure, but the
> code only checks for NULL. This leads to dereferencing an invalid error
> pointer and causes a kernel crash.
>
> Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() instead of a NULL check to properly handle both
> error pointers and NULL returns.
>
> Fixes: 63a759694eed ("debugobject: Prevent init race with static objects")
> Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> lib/debugobjects.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
> index 7f50c4480a4e..9587ef619054 100644
> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> @@ -741,9 +741,10 @@ __debug_object_init(void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr, int onstack
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags);
>
> obj = lookup_object_or_alloc(addr, db, descr, onstack, false);
> - if (unlikely(!obj)) {
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj)) {
Ideally, an API should either return error pointers to indicate errors
or solely return a NULL pointer to represent a failed operation. Mixing
error pointers and NULL pointers can easily lead to confusion about
what each represents.
In this case, it seems that lookup_object_or_alloc() only returns NULL
when alloc_object() fails due to being out of memory. Perhaps a better
approach would be to return -ENOMEM in this situation, then change the
check in __debug_object_init() to use IS_ERR(), and call
debug_objects_oom() when obj == ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). I think this might
make the code clearer.
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags);
> - debug_objects_oom();
> + if (!obj)
> + debug_objects_oom();
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.1.windows.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 7:57 [PATCH] debug: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() bug in __debug_object_init() Haotian Zhang
2025-11-10 13:39 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu [this message]
2025-11-11 2:15 ` [PATCH v2] debug: Fix a mixed use of NULL and error pointers Haotian Zhang
2025-11-13 19:49 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-11-13 20:03 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-11-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v3] debugobjects: Fix inconsistent return handling and potential ERR_PTR dereference Haotian Zhang
2025-11-15 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 18:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRHrGOKBi5UrlyGf@google.com \
--to=visitorckw@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox