From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix missing post-enqueue handling in move_local_task_to_local_dsq()
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:34:04 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTtxDOZ2nehjFwbL@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b53f8ef6-9cac-4b95-8ebb-0f498d02f4ac@arm.com>
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 11:35:17PM +0000, Christian Loehle wrote:
> On 12/11/25 22:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > move_local_task_to_local_dsq() is used when moving a task from a non-local
> > DSQ to a local DSQ on the same CPU. It directly manipulates the local DSQ
> > without going through dispatch_enqueue() and was missing the post-enqueue
> > handling that triggers preemption when SCX_ENQ_PREEMPT is set or the
> > enqueued task should preempt a lower priority task.
> >
> > This was fine when the function was only used from consume_dispatch_q()
> > where the CPU is already vacant and looking for the next task. However, the
> > function is now also used by move_task_between_dsqs() which backs
> > scx_bpf_dsq_move() which may be called while the CPU is busy.
>
> When was this changed? I couldn't find the commit when looking briefly :/
4c30f5ce4f7a ("sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_dispatch[_vtime]_from_dsq()")
which was v6.12, so upstream history-wise, the above paragraph isn't
accurate. It was broken from get-go. Will update the commit message. I'm
split on whether I should tag stable for it given that the usage pattern
isn't very common and there's some risk in the behavior change. Hmm... might
as well.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-12 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 22:48 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.19-fixes] sched_ext: Fix missing post-enqueue handling in move_local_task_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2025-12-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Factor out local_dsq_post_enq() from dispatch_enqueue() Tejun Heo
2025-12-11 23:23 ` Andrea Righi
2025-12-11 22:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix missing post-enqueue handling in move_local_task_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2025-12-11 23:27 ` Andrea Righi
2025-12-11 23:35 ` Christian Loehle
2025-12-12 1:34 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2025-12-11 23:29 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-6.19-fixes] " Andrea Righi
2025-12-12 1:45 ` [PATCHSET v2 " Tejun Heo
2025-12-12 1:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Factor out local_dsq_post_enq() from dispatch_enqueue() Tejun Heo
2025-12-12 5:50 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2025-12-12 1:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix missing post-enqueue handling in move_local_task_to_local_dsq() Tejun Heo
2025-12-12 5:57 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2025-12-12 16:28 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-6.19-fixes] " Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTtxDOZ2nehjFwbL@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox