From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: SCX_ENQ_IMMED potentially leaving dispatched tasks lingering on local DSQs
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 06:53:55 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad24a49fd02d7b397976975a13767bb4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DI0FTX13UW17.1IZJ9TMG9EFRA@google.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 09:48:11AM +0000, Kuba Piecuch wrote:
> I'm not sure if we should limit ourselves to just remote tasks.
> If we call wakeup_preempt(rq, p, flags) when adding @p to @rq's local DSQ
> regardless of whether @p/@rq is remote, then I think that should cover all
> cases and the patch above wouldn't be needed.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant adding wakeup_preempt() in
move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() *in addition to* your nr_immed/RETRY_TASK
patch. That combination covers both cases:
- Local (your stepwise scenario): the task stays on the dispatching CPU, no
migration happens, so there's no insertion-side hook to arm. Your nr_immed
check in do_pick_task_scx() catches it on the RETRY_TASK path.
- Remote: move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() is SCX's analog of
move_queued_task() and is missing the wakeup_preempt() call that
move_queued_task() does after activate_task(). Once added,
dst_rq->next_class is bumped to &ext_sched_class, and any subsequent
higher-class wakeup on dst_rq routes through wakeup_preempt_scx() which
already has the nr_immed reenqueue.
Adding wakeup_preempt() to local_dsq_post_enq() for every insertion would
work too, but I'd rather keep it in sync with how core sched handles
move_queued_task() and only add it where it's actually needed.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 13:21 SCX_ENQ_IMMED potentially leaving dispatched tasks lingering on local DSQs Kuba Piecuch
2026-04-22 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-23 9:48 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-04-23 16:53 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-04-23 19:12 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-04-23 19:29 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-23 20:03 ` Kuba Piecuch
2026-04-23 21:57 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad24a49fd02d7b397976975a13767bb4@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=jpiecuch@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox