From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: add p->scx.tid and SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK lookup
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:02:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeUms-ccHZhBNVKn@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3069bb592d7d09790ca9ff6d9b7d3b2@kernel.org>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 08:36:45AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
...
> +static void scx_tid_hash_insert(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&scx_tasks_lock);
> +
> + ret = rhashtable_lookup_insert_fast(&scx_tid_hash,
> + &p->scx.tid_hash_node,
> + scx_tid_hash_params);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> +}
Hm... WARN_ON_ONCE() only fires once, it can be hard to catch subsequent errors,
especially in case of -ENOMEM.
How about triggering WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EEXIST), which should be considered a
real sched_ext core bug, and use scx_error() for insert failures (ENOMEM).
In this way the error is more obvious for the BPF scheduler and can immediately
exit if it happens (even if scx_error() is probably a bit of a semantic stretch
in this case)?
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-19 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-19 18:36 [PATCH v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: add p->scx.tid and SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK lookup Tejun Heo
2026-04-19 18:39 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-19 19:02 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-04-19 19:15 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-19 19:24 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-19 20:19 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeUms-ccHZhBNVKn@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox