public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
	Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>,
	Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7712@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: add p->scx.tid and SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK lookup
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:15:16 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeUpxKBfgvgA1AWO@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeUms-ccHZhBNVKn@gpd4>

Hello,

On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 09:02:11PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Hm... WARN_ON_ONCE() only fires once, it can be hard to catch subsequent errors,
> especially in case of -ENOMEM.
> 
> How about triggering WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EEXIST), which should be considered a
> real sched_ext core bug, and use scx_error() for insert failures (ENOMEM).
> In this way the error is more obvious for the BPF scheduler and can immediately
> exit if it happens (even if scx_error() is probably a bit of a semantic stretch
> in this case)?

It can't fail with ENOMEM with insecure_elasticity set. It should never
fail. If it ever triggers, it's a bug that we need to fix.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-19 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-19 18:36 [PATCH v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: add p->scx.tid and SCX_OPS_TID_TO_TASK lookup Tejun Heo
2026-04-19 18:39 ` Cheng-Yang Chou
2026-04-19 19:02 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-19 19:15   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-04-19 19:24     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-19 20:19 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeUpxKBfgvgA1AWO@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=chia7712@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox