public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	leo.bras@arm.com, leo.yan@arm.com,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	 paulmck@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64/irqflags: force inline of arch_local_irq_enable()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 07:37:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeY5e0Y3Ua2DoPxF@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeY02X5MDWPhGPCK@J2N7QTR9R3>

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 03:14:49PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 06:15:24AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > >
> > > Are you happy to try that?
> >
> > Absolutely, I'll work on testing it that and put together a patch
> > addressing all of them.
> >
> > Should this be targeted for stable backports as well? If so, which
> > commit should I reference in the Fixes tag?
>
> I don't think we need to worry about backporting, and can do this as a
> cleanup for now unless someone shouts that they're seeing brokenness in
> a stable kernel.
>
> There's no specific commit for a fixes tag; this has always been a bit
> dodgy, but we've evidently been getting away with it in practice.

Ack. I'll run this through production testing for approximately 24
hours, then submit the patch.

Thanks,
--breno

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-20 12:42 [PATCH RFC] arm64/irqflags: force inline of arch_local_irq_enable() Breno Leitao
2026-04-20 13:06 ` Mark Rutland
2026-04-20 13:15   ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-20 14:14     ` Mark Rutland
2026-04-20 14:37       ` Breno Leitao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeY5e0Y3Ua2DoPxF@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leo.bras@arm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox