* RE: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx: use device node name as processor name
[not found] ` <830f0c65-faca-4843-a6c9-693db7562037@oss.nxp.com>
@ 2026-05-08 3:16 ` Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 3:18 ` [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use " Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 3:20 ` Jiafei Pan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiafei Pan @ 2026-05-08 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Baluta (OSS), andersson@kernel.org,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, Frank Li, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan
Cc: Daniel Baluta, Jiafei Pan
> On 4/30/26 09:17, Jiafei Pan wrote:
> > As currently there are maybe multiple remote processors, so change
> > from using fixed name to using device node name as remote processor
> > name in order to make them can be distinguished by through of name in
> > sys filesystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiafei Pan <Jiafei.Pan@nxp.com>
>
> Please use git log --oneline drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c and check the prefix
> subject for commit messges related to imx_rproc files.
>
>
>
> 9b2451658afa9 remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use devm_add_action_or_reset() for
> scu cleanup 65af722aa86fc remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use
> devm_clk_get_enabled() and simplify cleanup
> b0106defc0ff6 remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use devm_add_action_or_reset() for
> mailbox cleanup
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel.
Updated, thanks.
Jiafei.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use device node name as processor name
[not found] ` <830f0c65-faca-4843-a6c9-693db7562037@oss.nxp.com>
2026-05-08 3:16 ` [PATCH] remoteproc: imx: use device node name as processor name Jiafei Pan
@ 2026-05-08 3:18 ` Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 3:20 ` Jiafei Pan
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiafei Pan @ 2026-05-08 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daniel.baluta
Cc: Frank.Li, Jiafei.Pan, andersson, daniel.baluta, festevam, imx,
kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc,
mathieu.poirier, peng.fan, s.hauer
As currently there are maybe multiple remote processors, so change from
using fixed name to using device node name as remote processor name in
order to make them can be distinguished by through of name in sys
filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Jiafei Pan <Jiafei.Pan@nxp.com>
---
Fixes sine v1:
* Update patch subject to aligin prefix name with existing patches
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index e8d239bef5c9..38713f6f1c50 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -1356,8 +1356,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
unsigned long cpus_bits;
int ret;
- /* set some other name then imx */
- rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, "imx-rproc", &imx_rproc_ops,
+ rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &imx_rproc_ops,
NULL, sizeof(*priv));
if (!rproc)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use device node name as processor name
[not found] ` <830f0c65-faca-4843-a6c9-693db7562037@oss.nxp.com>
2026-05-08 3:16 ` [PATCH] remoteproc: imx: use device node name as processor name Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 3:18 ` [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use " Jiafei Pan
@ 2026-05-08 3:20 ` Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 6:28 ` Daniel Baluta
2026-05-09 3:32 ` Peng Fan
2 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiafei Pan @ 2026-05-08 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: daniel.baluta
Cc: Frank.Li, Jiafei.Pan, andersson, festevam, imx, kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, mathieu.poirier,
peng.fan, s.hauer
As currently there are maybe multiple remote processors, so change from
using fixed name to using device node name as remote processor name in
order to make them can be distinguished by through of name in sys
filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Jiafei Pan <Jiafei.Pan@nxp.com>
---
Fixes sine v1:
* Update patch subject to aligin prefix name with existing patches
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index e8d239bef5c9..38713f6f1c50 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -1356,8 +1356,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
unsigned long cpus_bits;
int ret;
- /* set some other name then imx */
- rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, "imx-rproc", &imx_rproc_ops,
+ rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &imx_rproc_ops,
NULL, sizeof(*priv));
if (!rproc)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use device node name as processor name
2026-05-08 3:20 ` Jiafei Pan
@ 2026-05-08 6:28 ` Daniel Baluta
2026-05-09 3:32 ` Peng Fan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Baluta @ 2026-05-08 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiafei Pan, daniel.baluta
Cc: Frank.Li, andersson, festevam, imx, kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, mathieu.poirier, peng.fan,
s.hauer
On 5/8/26 06:20, Jiafei Pan wrote:
> As currently there are maybe multiple remote processors, so change from
> using fixed name to using device node name as remote processor name in
> order to make them can be distinguished by through of name in sys
> filesystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiafei Pan <Jiafei.Pan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
> ---
> Fixes sine v1:
> * Update patch subject to aligin prefix name with existing patches
>
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index e8d239bef5c9..38713f6f1c50 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -1356,8 +1356,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> unsigned long cpus_bits;
> int ret;
>
> - /* set some other name then imx */
> - rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, "imx-rproc", &imx_rproc_ops,
> + rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &imx_rproc_ops,
> NULL, sizeof(*priv));
> if (!rproc)
> return -ENOMEM;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use device node name as processor name
2026-05-08 3:20 ` Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 6:28 ` Daniel Baluta
@ 2026-05-09 3:32 ` Peng Fan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2026-05-09 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiafei Pan
Cc: daniel.baluta, Frank.Li, andersson, festevam, imx, kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-remoteproc, mathieu.poirier,
peng.fan, s.hauer
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 11:20:16AM +0800, Jiafei Pan wrote:
>As currently there are maybe multiple remote processors, so change from
>using fixed name to using device node name as remote processor name in
>order to make them can be distinguished by through of name in sys
>filesystem.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jiafei Pan <Jiafei.Pan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
BTW:
please don't create thread with v1.
2026-04-30 6:17 [PATCH] remoteproc: imx: use device node name as processor name Jiafei Pan
2026-04-30 14:17 ` Daniel Baluta
2026-05-08 3:16 ` Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 3:18 ` [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use " Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 3:20 ` Jiafei Pan
2026-05-08 6:28 ` Daniel Baluta
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ac390c82-91d9-4d8c-9514-b7cac0a4dd8a@oss.nxp.com/T/#mf211972b33053e6cb0b4adbe1002623d911e0214
Regards
Peng
>---
>Fixes sine v1:
>* Update patch subject to aligin prefix name with existing patches
>
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>index e8d239bef5c9..38713f6f1c50 100644
>--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>@@ -1356,8 +1356,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> unsigned long cpus_bits;
> int ret;
>
>- /* set some other name then imx */
>- rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, "imx-rproc", &imx_rproc_ops,
>+ rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &imx_rproc_ops,
> NULL, sizeof(*priv));
> if (!rproc)
> return -ENOMEM;
>--
>2.43.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread