Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SoC series

[Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/04/2026 09:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:34:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
...
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..00d189cfed8c
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,4511 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (c) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >> +
> >> +/ {
> >> +	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> >> +	#address-cells = <2>;
> >> +	#size-cells = <2>;
> >> +
> >> +	cpus {
> >> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> >> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> +		cpu0: cpu@0 {
> >> +			device_type = "cpu";
> >> +			compatible = "qcom,oryon-1-5";
> > 
> > I asked you to send this binding WITH the user, because they go via
> > the same tree. I see the user, but no binding for it in the patchset.
> 
> And few others like SCM are also missing. I am talking about this many
> times already, to multiple vendors, and I am still surprised why people
> on purpose give more work to the maintainer. Well, not my tree, so not
> my work, but if you ever wonder why your patches are not applied for
> longer time, that could be one of the reasons.

Yes, I should have sent all those bindings targeting Bjorn as part of
this series to make it easier for Bjorn.  But I'm not sure cpus.yaml
change is one of them, as I'm sending it to Rob.

Shawn