public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Tidy up LPI allocation
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 10:45:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afhcw4u4413uZeUM@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cxzeayd1.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Sat, May 02, 2026 at 11:40:10AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> 
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:33:58 +0100,
> Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > LPIs are owned by the LPI domain, so allocating and freeing them from
> > the ITS MSI and IPI domains was always a bit backwards. Those domains
> > should only ask their parent for interrupts, and never need to
> > know how the parent picks or releases the underlying LPIs (or do it on
> > behalf of said parent, as was the case).
> > 
> > This series moves LPI allocation into the LPI domain itself and
> > removes the exported wrappers that allowed LPI allocation from elsewhere.
> > 
> > With that done, the LPI domain can also be slightly reworked to
> > support allocating and freeing more than one LPI at a time. This
> > rework is extended to the IPI allocation, too. The last patch makes
> > the ITS MSI domain request its parent interrupts as a single range,
> > matching the IPI cleanup from the previous patch.
> > 
> > As a side effect of these changes, the IPI path now unwinds earlier
> > parent allocations correctly if a later allocation fails.
> 
> Thanks for cleaning up this mess. It aligns the GICv5 host code with
> the expectations we have for hierarchical domains (don't mess with
> your parent's allocations), and will make the KVM management of
> doorbell LPIs less awkward. It also removes global helpers that always
> irked me, so:

Bah, sorry, it not only breaks the IRQ domains expectations but
the current allocation is really braindead - I was too fixated on
the IDA 1 by 1 allocation (that should really disappear asap) that
I could not see the wood for the trees.

Thank you Sascha for cleaning it up.

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>

> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> 
> Thomas, could you please take th in at the earliest opportunity?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- 
> Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-30 15:33 [PATCH 0/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Tidy up LPI allocation Sascha Bischoff
2026-04-30 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Move LPI alloc/free into LPI domain Sascha Bischoff
2026-05-05 20:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-30 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Allow for nr_irqs > 1 for LPI alloc and teardown Sascha Bischoff
2026-05-05 20:08   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-30 15:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Allocate ITS parent LPIs as a range Sascha Bischoff
2026-05-02 10:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] irqchip/gic-v5: Tidy up LPI allocation Marc Zyngier
2026-05-04  8:45   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2026-05-05  9:03     ` Sascha Bischoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afhcw4u4413uZeUM@lpieralisi \
    --to=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox