From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
rppt@kernel.org, sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, jbouron@amazon.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org,
liaoyuanhong@vivo.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
piliu@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, graf@amazon.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] liveupdate: block outgoing session mutations during serialization
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 11:25:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aftaoEKcC_rpB6jm@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2vxzy0hwzzym.fsf@kernel.org>
On 05-06 10:47, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Wed, May 06 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>
> > Introduce a 'rebooting' flag in the session header to ensure that once
> > serialization has started, no new outgoing session mutations (creations
> > or file preservations) can occur.
>
> Would it be a better idea to hold the session header lock and locks of
> each session? This would prevent anyone else from getting access to any
> of the sessions, and we don't have to worry about all the weird cases
> when one might add a file to a serialized session or something similar.
>
> Once liveupdate_reboot() returns success, there is no going back anyway
> so I don't think it matters much that some tasks will be left waiting.
Overall, we can do that. The only possible issue I can think of is that
we might get some stupid warnings if the shutdown takes too long:
INFO: task ... blocked for more than ... seconds
followed by a call trace.
But that is unlikely, and it also means that userspace has been trying
to mutate sessions when it should not have, so I think your approach is
workable. Let me update the implementation.
Pasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 4:32 [PATCH v1 0/3] liveupdate: serialization safety and race fixes Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06 4:32 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] liveupdate: skip serialization for context-preserving kexec Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06 8:31 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-06 15:12 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06 15:33 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-06 16:06 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06 4:32 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] liveupdate: block outgoing session mutations during serialization Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06 8:47 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-06 15:25 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2026-05-06 4:32 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] liveupdate: pin sessions and handle inactive ones " Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06 8:53 ` Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aftaoEKcC_rpB6jm@google.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jbouron@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liaoyuanhong@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=piliu@redhat.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox