[PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[Juri Lelli]

The dl_server_timer() causes spurious IPIs on nohz_full cores, breaking
isolation guarantees. The timer executes on a housekeeping core and
eventually calls tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(), sending IPIs to isolated cores
even when only a single task is running.

The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
state. Timers can fire and send IPIs to otherwise undisturbed cores.

Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():

- When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server
  and keep the tick running
- When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
  (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
- When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick

Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
handles both RR and FIFO cases.

Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
---
I had to modify my first original attempt at fixing this (please take a
look at the linked report/discussion) to also take SCX into
consideration.

FYI, I temporarily pushed the script I'm using to repro and verify the
fix here

https://github.com/jlelli/sched-deadline-tests/blob/master/test-dlserver-nohz.sh
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b905805bbcbe4..98759255c306b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1414,30 +1414,35 @@ static inline bool __need_bw_check(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 
 bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	int fifo_nr_running;
-
 	/* Deadline tasks, even if single, need the tick */
 	if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
 		return false;
 
 	/*
-	 * If there are more than one RR tasks, we need the tick to affect the
-	 * actual RR behaviour.
+	 * If there are RT tasks, we may need the tick (for >1 RR tasks),
+	 * but we must also service lower-priority CFS/SCX tasks via dl-servers.
 	 */
-	if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running) {
-		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running == 1)
-			return true;
-		else
+	if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running) {
+		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued) {
+			dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
+			return false;
+		}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
+		if (rq->scx.nr_running) {
+			dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
+			return false;
+		}
+#endif
+		/*
+		 * Only RT tasks, no CFS/SCX. Stop servers to prevent spurious
+		 * wakeups. Tick can stop for single RR or any FIFO, but must
+		 * run for multiple RR (round-robin behavior).
+		 */
+		dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
+		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running > 1)
 			return false;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * If there's no RR tasks, but FIFO tasks, we can skip the tick, no
-	 * forced preemption between FIFO tasks.
-	 */
-	fifo_nr_running = rq->rt.rt_nr_running - rq->rt.rr_nr_running;
-	if (fifo_nr_running)
 		return true;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If there are no DL,RR/FIFO tasks, there must only be CFS or SCX tasks
@@ -1462,6 +1467,7 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
 			return false;
 	}
 
+	dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
 	return true;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
@@ -8810,10 +8816,7 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
 		WARN(true, "Dying CPU not properly vacated!");
 		dump_rq_tasks(rq, KERN_WARNING);
 	}
-	dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
-	dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
-#endif
+	dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
 	rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
 
 	calc_load_migrate(rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index edca7849b165d..c2b3d6bbe4828 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1826,6 +1826,20 @@ void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	dl_se->dl_server_active = 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Stop all dl-servers on this runqueue. Called when transitioning to a state
+ * where the tick can be stopped (e.g., single RR/FIFO task, or no RT tasks).
+ * This ensures server timers are disarmed and won't cause spurious wakeups on
+ * nohz_full isolated cores.
+ */
+void dl_servers_stop_all(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
+	dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
+#endif
+}
+
 void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
 		    dl_server_pick_f pick_task)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 9f63b15d309d1..26cf1d14efde5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ extern void dl_server_update_idle(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
 extern void dl_server_update(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec);
 extern void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
 extern void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
+extern void dl_servers_stop_all(struct rq *rq);
 extern void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
 		    dl_server_pick_f pick_task);
 extern void sched_init_dl_servers(void);

---
base-commit: 4ac4d6549a6563878d7c19c154e017f6cb7114d3
change-id: 20260512-upstream-fix-dlserver-nohzfull-b4-b745e2a967ed

Best regards,
--  
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[Furkan Çalışkan]

Hi Juri,

On 5/12/26 12:02, Juri Lelli wrote:
> The dl_server_timer() causes spurious IPIs on nohz_full cores, breaking
> isolation guarantees. The timer executes on a housekeeping core and
> eventually calls tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(), sending IPIs to isolated cores
> even when only a single task is running.
> 
> The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
> state. Timers can fire and send IPIs to otherwise undisturbed cores.
> 
> Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():
> 
> - When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server
>   and keep the tick running
> - When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
>   (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
> - When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick
> 
> Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
> server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
> handles both RR and FIFO cases.
> 
> Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
> Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> ---
> I had to modify my first original attempt at fixing this (please take a
> look at the linked report/discussion) to also take SCX into
> consideration.
> 
> FYI, I temporarily pushed the script I'm using to repro and verify the
> fix here
> 
> https://github.com/jlelli/sched-deadline-tests/blob/master/test-dlserver-nohz.sh
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index b905805bbcbe4..98759255c306b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1414,30 +1414,35 @@ static inline bool __need_bw_check(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  
>  bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	int fifo_nr_running;
> -
>  	/* Deadline tasks, even if single, need the tick */
>  	if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If there are more than one RR tasks, we need the tick to affect the
> -	 * actual RR behaviour.
> +	 * If there are RT tasks, we may need the tick (for >1 RR tasks),
> +	 * but we must also service lower-priority CFS/SCX tasks via dl-servers.
>  	 */
> -	if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running) {
> -		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running == 1)
> -			return true;
> -		else
> +	if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running) {
> +		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued) {
> +			dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> +		if (rq->scx.nr_running) {
> +			dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +#endif

In the above block, the CFS and SCX server start paths are mutually exclusive. 
If both cfs.h_nr_queued and scx.nr_running are non-zero at the same time, only 
fair_server gets started and ext_server remains stopped. Could that leave SCX 
tasks without server coverage in a mixed CFS+SCX+RT scenario?

---
Thanks,
Furkan Caliskan

Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[Juri Lelli]

Hi Furkan,

On 12/05/26 13:06, Furkan Çalışkan wrote:
> Hi Juri,
> 
> On 5/12/26 12:02, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > The dl_server_timer() causes spurious IPIs on nohz_full cores, breaking
> > isolation guarantees. The timer executes on a housekeeping core and
> > eventually calls tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(), sending IPIs to isolated cores
> > even when only a single task is running.
> > 
> > The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
> > state. Timers can fire and send IPIs to otherwise undisturbed cores.
> > 
> > Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():
> > 
> > - When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server
> >   and keep the tick running
> > - When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
> >   (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
> > - When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick
> > 
> > Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
> > server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
> > handles both RR and FIFO cases.
> > 
> > Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
> > Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > I had to modify my first original attempt at fixing this (please take a
> > look at the linked report/discussion) to also take SCX into
> > consideration.
> > 
> > FYI, I temporarily pushed the script I'm using to repro and verify the
> > fix here
> > 
> > https://github.com/jlelli/sched-deadline-tests/blob/master/test-dlserver-nohz.sh
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/core.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index b905805bbcbe4..98759255c306b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -1414,30 +1414,35 @@ static inline bool __need_bw_check(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> >  
> >  bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> >  {
> > -	int fifo_nr_running;
> > -
> >  	/* Deadline tasks, even if single, need the tick */
> >  	if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * If there are more than one RR tasks, we need the tick to affect the
> > -	 * actual RR behaviour.
> > +	 * If there are RT tasks, we may need the tick (for >1 RR tasks),
> > +	 * but we must also service lower-priority CFS/SCX tasks via dl-servers.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running) {
> > -		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running == 1)
> > -			return true;
> > -		else
> > +	if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running) {
> > +		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued) {
> > +			dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
> > +			return false;
> > +		}
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> > +		if (rq->scx.nr_running) {
> > +			dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
> > +			return false;
> > +		}
> > +#endif
> 
> In the above block, the CFS and SCX server start paths are mutually exclusive. 
> If both cfs.h_nr_queued and scx.nr_running are non-zero at the same time, only 
> fair_server gets started and ext_server remains stopped. Could that leave SCX 
> tasks without server coverage in a mixed CFS+SCX+RT scenario?

Indeed there is the partial switch mode to consider. Can fix in the next
version.

Thanks,
Juri

Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[Frederic Weisbecker]

Le Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:02:37AM +0200, Juri Lelli a écrit :
> The dl_server_timer() causes spurious IPIs on nohz_full cores, breaking
> isolation guarantees. The timer executes on a housekeeping core and
> eventually calls tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(), sending IPIs to isolated cores
> even when only a single task is running.
> 
> The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
> state. Timers can fire and send IPIs to otherwise undisturbed cores.
> 
> Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():
> 
> - When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server
>   and keep the tick running
> - When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
>   (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
> - When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick
> 
> Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
> server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
> handles both RR and FIFO cases.
> 
> Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
> Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

I indeed observed IPIs originating from dl_server some time
ago but that magically disappeared after some commit from Peter.

Perhaps it came back somehow? Lemme run dynticks-testing again on
latest upstream...

> ---
> I had to modify my first original attempt at fixing this (please take a
> look at the linked report/discussion) to also take SCX into
> consideration.

I thought SCX was disabled when CPU isolation is running?

9f391f94a173 ("sched_ext: Disallow loading BPF scheduler if isolcpus= domain
isolation is in effect")

Thanks.

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[Juri Lelli]

On 12/05/26 16:03, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:02:37AM +0200, Juri Lelli a écrit :
> > The dl_server_timer() causes spurious IPIs on nohz_full cores, breaking
> > isolation guarantees. The timer executes on a housekeeping core and
> > eventually calls tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(), sending IPIs to isolated cores
> > even when only a single task is running.
> > 
> > The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
> > state. Timers can fire and send IPIs to otherwise undisturbed cores.
> > 
> > Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():
> > 
> > - When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server
> >   and keep the tick running
> > - When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
> >   (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
> > - When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick
> > 
> > Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
> > server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
> > handles both RR and FIFO cases.
> > 
> > Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
> > Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> 
> I indeed observed IPIs originating from dl_server some time
> ago but that magically disappeared after some commit from Peter.
> 
> Perhaps it came back somehow? Lemme run dynticks-testing again on
> latest upstream...

So, the IPIs seem to be indeed gone also from my recent testing (decided
to keep the reference/context in the changelog for historical reasons,
but can remove). But the dl_task_timer (dl-server timer) for isolated
CPUs is still firing on housekeeping and that is what this is
addressing.

> > ---
> > I had to modify my first original attempt at fixing this (please take a
> > look at the linked report/discussion) to also take SCX into
> > consideration.
> 
> I thought SCX was disabled when CPU isolation is running?
> 
> 9f391f94a173 ("sched_ext: Disallow loading BPF scheduler if isolcpus= domain
> isolation is in effect")

Ah, thanks for poiting it out, it indeed simplify things. :)

And thanks for the super quick review!

Best,
Juri

Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[Andrea Righi]

Hi Juri,

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:02:37AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> The dl_server_timer() causes spurious IPIs on nohz_full cores, breaking
> isolation guarantees. The timer executes on a housekeeping core and
> eventually calls tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(), sending IPIs to isolated cores
> even when only a single task is running.
> 
> The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
> state. Timers can fire and send IPIs to otherwise undisturbed cores.
> 
> Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():
> 
> - When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server
>   and keep the tick running
> - When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
>   (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
> - When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick
> 
> Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
> server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
> handles both RR and FIFO cases.
> 
> Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
> Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> ---
> I had to modify my first original attempt at fixing this (please take a
> look at the linked report/discussion) to also take SCX into
> consideration.

As mentioned by Frederic, we don't allow to load BPF schedulers when isolcpus=
is used, so I think we can simplify the sched_can_stop_tick() part.

> 
> FYI, I temporarily pushed the script I'm using to repro and verify the
> fix here
> 
> https://github.com/jlelli/sched-deadline-tests/blob/master/test-dlserver-nohz.sh
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index b905805bbcbe4..98759255c306b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1414,30 +1414,35 @@ static inline bool __need_bw_check(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  
>  bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	int fifo_nr_running;
> -
>  	/* Deadline tasks, even if single, need the tick */
>  	if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If there are more than one RR tasks, we need the tick to affect the
> -	 * actual RR behaviour.
> +	 * If there are RT tasks, we may need the tick (for >1 RR tasks),
> +	 * but we must also service lower-priority CFS/SCX tasks via dl-servers.

No need to mention SCX, maybe we can add a note that SCX is incompatible with
isolcpus, so there's no SCX task to run here.

>  	 */
> -	if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running) {
> -		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running == 1)
> -			return true;
> -		else
> +	if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running) {
> +		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued) {
> +			dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> +		if (rq->scx.nr_running) {
> +			dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +#endif

This #ifdef block can go away.

> +		/*
> +		 * Only RT tasks, no CFS/SCX. Stop servers to prevent spurious

CFS/SCX -> CFS.

> +		 * wakeups. Tick can stop for single RR or any FIFO, but must
> +		 * run for multiple RR (round-robin behavior).
> +		 */
> +		dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
> +		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running > 1)
>  			return false;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If there's no RR tasks, but FIFO tasks, we can skip the tick, no
> -	 * forced preemption between FIFO tasks.
> -	 */
> -	fifo_nr_running = rq->rt.rt_nr_running - rq->rt.rr_nr_running;
> -	if (fifo_nr_running)
>  		return true;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If there are no DL,RR/FIFO tasks, there must only be CFS or SCX tasks
> @@ -1462,6 +1467,7 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
>  			return false;
>  	}
>  
> +	dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
>  	return true;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> @@ -8810,10 +8816,7 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>  		WARN(true, "Dying CPU not properly vacated!");
>  		dump_rq_tasks(rq, KERN_WARNING);
>  	}
> -	dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> -	dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
> -#endif
> +	dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
>  	rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>  
>  	calc_load_migrate(rq);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index edca7849b165d..c2b3d6bbe4828 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1826,6 +1826,20 @@ void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
>  	dl_se->dl_server_active = 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Stop all dl-servers on this runqueue. Called when transitioning to a state
> + * where the tick can be stopped (e.g., single RR/FIFO task, or no RT tasks).
> + * This ensures server timers are disarmed and won't cause spurious wakeups on
> + * nohz_full isolated cores.
> + */
> +void dl_servers_stop_all(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> +	dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
> +#endif
> +}

And I think the dl_servers_stop_all() helper still makes sense, stopping the
ext_server is still needed in sched_cpu_dying() and calling dl_server_stop() on
an already-inactive server is harmless in the no-RT path.

Thanks,
-Andrea

> +
>  void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
>  		    dl_server_pick_f pick_task)
>  {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 9f63b15d309d1..26cf1d14efde5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ extern void dl_server_update_idle(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
>  extern void dl_server_update(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec);
>  extern void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
>  extern void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
> +extern void dl_servers_stop_all(struct rq *rq);
>  extern void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
>  		    dl_server_pick_f pick_task);
>  extern void sched_init_dl_servers(void);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 4ac4d6549a6563878d7c19c154e017f6cb7114d3
> change-id: 20260512-upstream-fix-dlserver-nohzfull-b4-b745e2a967ed
> 
> Best regards,
> --  
> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> 

Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Make dl-server nohz full aware

[Juri Lelli]

Hi Andrea,

On 12/05/26 16:55, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Hi Juri,

Thanks from the quick review!

> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:02:37AM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > The dl_server_timer() causes spurious IPIs on nohz_full cores, breaking
> > isolation guarantees. The timer executes on a housekeeping core and
> > eventually calls tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(), sending IPIs to isolated cores
> > even when only a single task is running.
> > 
> > The problem is that dl-servers are not coordinated with nohz_full tick
> > state. Timers can fire and send IPIs to otherwise undisturbed cores.
> > 
> > Fix by managing servers in sched_can_stop_tick():
> > 
> > - When RT tasks run with CFS/SCX tasks, start the appropriate server
> >   and keep the tick running
> > - When only RT tasks remain, stop all servers and allow tick to stop
> >   (except for >1 RR tasks which need the tick for round-robin)
> > - When only CFS/SCX tasks remain, stop all servers before stopping tick
> > 
> > Introduce dl_servers_stop_all() to reduce duplication and abstract
> > server management from core.c. Unify RT handling into one block that
> > handles both RR and FIFO cases.
> > 
> > Fixes: 557a6bfc662c ("sched/fair: Add trivial fair server")
> > Reported-by: David Haufe <dhaufe@simplextrading.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKJHwtOw_G67edzuHVtL1xC5Vyt6StcZzihtDd0yaKudW=rwVw@mail.gmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > I had to modify my first original attempt at fixing this (please take a
> > look at the linked report/discussion) to also take SCX into
> > consideration.
> 
> As mentioned by Frederic, we don't allow to load BPF schedulers when isolcpus=
> is used, so I think we can simplify the sched_can_stop_tick() part.

Right! Thanks for confirming.

> > 
> > FYI, I temporarily pushed the script I'm using to repro and verify the
> > fix here
> > 
> > https://github.com/jlelli/sched-deadline-tests/blob/master/test-dlserver-nohz.sh
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/core.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index b905805bbcbe4..98759255c306b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -1414,30 +1414,35 @@ static inline bool __need_bw_check(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> >  
> >  bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> >  {
> > -	int fifo_nr_running;
> > -
> >  	/* Deadline tasks, even if single, need the tick */
> >  	if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * If there are more than one RR tasks, we need the tick to affect the
> > -	 * actual RR behaviour.
> > +	 * If there are RT tasks, we may need the tick (for >1 RR tasks),
> > +	 * but we must also service lower-priority CFS/SCX tasks via dl-servers.
> 
> No need to mention SCX, maybe we can add a note that SCX is incompatible with
> isolcpus, so there's no SCX task to run here.

Ack.

> 
> >  	 */
> > -	if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running) {
> > -		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running == 1)
> > -			return true;
> > -		else
> > +	if (rq->rt.rt_nr_running) {
> > +		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued) {
> > +			dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
> > +			return false;
> > +		}
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> > +		if (rq->scx.nr_running) {
> > +			dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
> > +			return false;
> > +		}
> > +#endif
> 
> This #ifdef block can go away.
> 
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Only RT tasks, no CFS/SCX. Stop servers to prevent spurious
> 
> CFS/SCX -> CFS.
> 
> > +		 * wakeups. Tick can stop for single RR or any FIFO, but must
> > +		 * run for multiple RR (round-robin behavior).
> > +		 */
> > +		dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
> > +		if (rq->rt.rr_nr_running > 1)
> >  			return false;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * If there's no RR tasks, but FIFO tasks, we can skip the tick, no
> > -	 * forced preemption between FIFO tasks.
> > -	 */
> > -	fifo_nr_running = rq->rt.rt_nr_running - rq->rt.rr_nr_running;
> > -	if (fifo_nr_running)
> >  		return true;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If there are no DL,RR/FIFO tasks, there must only be CFS or SCX tasks
> > @@ -1462,6 +1467,7 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> >  			return false;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> > @@ -8810,10 +8816,7 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
> >  		WARN(true, "Dying CPU not properly vacated!");
> >  		dump_rq_tasks(rq, KERN_WARNING);
> >  	}
> > -	dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> > -	dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
> > -#endif
> > +	dl_servers_stop_all(rq);
> >  	rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
> >  
> >  	calc_load_migrate(rq);
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index edca7849b165d..c2b3d6bbe4828 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -1826,6 +1826,20 @@ void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
> >  	dl_se->dl_server_active = 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Stop all dl-servers on this runqueue. Called when transitioning to a state
> > + * where the tick can be stopped (e.g., single RR/FIFO task, or no RT tasks).
> > + * This ensures server timers are disarmed and won't cause spurious wakeups on
> > + * nohz_full isolated cores.
> > + */
> > +void dl_servers_stop_all(struct rq *rq)
> > +{
> > +	dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
> > +	dl_server_stop(&rq->ext_server);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> 
> And I think the dl_servers_stop_all() helper still makes sense, stopping the
> ext_server is still needed in sched_cpu_dying() and calling dl_server_stop() on
> an already-inactive server is harmless in the no-RT path.

And ack to all the above. Will send out a v2 soon.

Best,
Juri