The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 03/18] riscv: add support for srmcfg CSR from Ssqosid extension
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 20:55:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahPIKDdzr4SDSaGD@gen8> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525003007.7D4E91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>

On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 12:30:07AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > +static int riscv_srmcfg_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > +				  unsigned long action, void *unused)
> > +{
> > +	switch (action) {
> > +	case CPU_PM_EXIT:
> > +	case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
> > +		__this_cpu_write(cpu_srmcfg, U32_MAX);
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +}
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Does this leave the currently executing task with an incorrect hardware CSR
> state?
> 
> While the software cache is invalidated by setting cpu_srmcfg to U32_MAX,
> the hardware CSR_SRMCFG register is not explicitly reprogrammed during
> CPU_PM_EXIT.
> 
> Since the hardware state may be lost or reset to an implementation-defined
> value upon resume, wouldn't the task running at resume time continue executing
> with the wrong QoS tag until it is eventually preempted?

This is not a problem. cache invalidation is sufficient. CSR write here
would be setting a value that __switch_to_srmcfg() will re-write moments
later.

> > +static int __init riscv_srmcfg_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	if (!riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSQOSID))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * cpuhp_setup_state() invokes the startup callback locally on every
> > +	 * already-online CPU, so no separate seed loop is needed here.
> > +	 */
> > +	err = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv/srmcfg:online",
> > +				riscv_srmcfg_online, NULL);
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Should a teardown callback be provided to cpuhp_setup_state() to invalidate
> the cpu_srmcfg cache when a CPU goes offline?

The startup callback riscv_srmcfg_online() is the one that invalidates
the cache. A teardown callback that did the same thing on offline would be
redundant with the online seed. 

> Without a teardown callback, a CPU going offline retains its previous
> cpu_srmcfg value. When brought back online, its hardware CSR is reset.
> 
> Tasks scheduling before the CPU reaches the CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state might
> skip the CSR write if their thread srmcfg tag matches the stale cache. Could
> this allow those early context switches to bypass resource constraints by
> running with the hardware-reset CSR?

I will move the seed earlier to CPUHP_AP_STARTING so the cache is
invalidated before the CPU is scheduleable.

-Drew

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-25  3:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-24 23:55 [PATCH RFC v5 00/18] riscv: add Ssqosid and CBQRI resctrl support Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 01/18] dt-bindings: riscv: Add Ssqosid extension description Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 02/18] riscv: detect the Ssqosid extension Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 03/18] riscv: add support for srmcfg CSR from " Drew Fustini
     [not found]   ` <20260525003007.7D4E91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25  3:55     ` Drew Fustini [this message]
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 04/18] fs/resctrl: Add resctrl_is_membw() helper Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 05/18] fs/resctrl: Add RDT_RESOURCE_MB_MIN and RDT_RESOURCE_MB_WGHT Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 06/18] fs/resctrl: Let bandwidth resources default to min_bw at reset Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 07/18] riscv_cbqri: Add capacity controller probe and allocation device ops Drew Fustini
     [not found]   ` <20260525003019.5597A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25  4:16     ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 08/18] riscv_cbqri: Add capacity controller monitoring " Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 09/18] riscv_cbqri: Add bandwidth controller probe and allocation " Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 10/18] riscv_cbqri: Add bandwidth controller monitoring " Drew Fustini
     [not found]   ` <20260525003608.AC42A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25  7:25     ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 11/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add cache allocation via capacity block mask Drew Fustini
     [not found]   ` <20260525005056.312281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25  7:40     ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 12/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add L3 cache occupancy monitoring Drew Fustini
     [not found]   ` <20260525004606.D82941F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-26 11:49     ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 13/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add MB_MIN bandwidth allocation via Rbwb Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 14/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add MB_WGHT bandwidth allocation via Mweight Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 15/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add mbm_total_bytes bandwidth monitoring Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 16/18] ACPI: RISC-V: Parse RISC-V Quality of Service Controller (RQSC) table Drew Fustini
2026-05-25  8:23   ` Sunil V L
2026-05-31  1:51     ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 17/18] ACPI: RISC-V: Add support for RISC-V Quality of Service Controller (RQSC) Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 18/18] riscv: enable resctrl filesystem for Ssqosid Drew Fustini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ahPIKDdzr4SDSaGD@gen8 \
    --to=fustini@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox