From: Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 03/18] riscv: add support for srmcfg CSR from Ssqosid extension
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 20:55:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahPIKDdzr4SDSaGD@gen8> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525003007.7D4E91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 12:30:07AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > +static int riscv_srmcfg_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > + unsigned long action, void *unused)
> > +{
> > + switch (action) {
> > + case CPU_PM_EXIT:
> > + case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
> > + __this_cpu_write(cpu_srmcfg, U32_MAX);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +}
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this leave the currently executing task with an incorrect hardware CSR
> state?
>
> While the software cache is invalidated by setting cpu_srmcfg to U32_MAX,
> the hardware CSR_SRMCFG register is not explicitly reprogrammed during
> CPU_PM_EXIT.
>
> Since the hardware state may be lost or reset to an implementation-defined
> value upon resume, wouldn't the task running at resume time continue executing
> with the wrong QoS tag until it is eventually preempted?
This is not a problem. cache invalidation is sufficient. CSR write here
would be setting a value that __switch_to_srmcfg() will re-write moments
later.
> > +static int __init riscv_srmcfg_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (!riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSQOSID))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * cpuhp_setup_state() invokes the startup callback locally on every
> > + * already-online CPU, so no separate seed loop is needed here.
> > + */
> > + err = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv/srmcfg:online",
> > + riscv_srmcfg_online, NULL);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Should a teardown callback be provided to cpuhp_setup_state() to invalidate
> the cpu_srmcfg cache when a CPU goes offline?
The startup callback riscv_srmcfg_online() is the one that invalidates
the cache. A teardown callback that did the same thing on offline would be
redundant with the online seed.
> Without a teardown callback, a CPU going offline retains its previous
> cpu_srmcfg value. When brought back online, its hardware CSR is reset.
>
> Tasks scheduling before the CPU reaches the CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state might
> skip the CSR write if their thread srmcfg tag matches the stale cache. Could
> this allow those early context switches to bypass resource constraints by
> running with the hardware-reset CSR?
I will move the seed earlier to CPUHP_AP_STARTING so the cache is
invalidated before the CPU is scheduleable.
-Drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-24 23:55 [PATCH RFC v5 00/18] riscv: add Ssqosid and CBQRI resctrl support Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 01/18] dt-bindings: riscv: Add Ssqosid extension description Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 02/18] riscv: detect the Ssqosid extension Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 03/18] riscv: add support for srmcfg CSR from " Drew Fustini
[not found] ` <20260525003007.7D4E91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25 3:55 ` Drew Fustini [this message]
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 04/18] fs/resctrl: Add resctrl_is_membw() helper Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 05/18] fs/resctrl: Add RDT_RESOURCE_MB_MIN and RDT_RESOURCE_MB_WGHT Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 06/18] fs/resctrl: Let bandwidth resources default to min_bw at reset Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 07/18] riscv_cbqri: Add capacity controller probe and allocation device ops Drew Fustini
[not found] ` <20260525003019.5597A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25 4:16 ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 08/18] riscv_cbqri: Add capacity controller monitoring " Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 09/18] riscv_cbqri: Add bandwidth controller probe and allocation " Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 10/18] riscv_cbqri: Add bandwidth controller monitoring " Drew Fustini
[not found] ` <20260525003608.AC42A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25 7:25 ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 11/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add cache allocation via capacity block mask Drew Fustini
[not found] ` <20260525005056.312281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-25 7:40 ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 12/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add L3 cache occupancy monitoring Drew Fustini
[not found] ` <20260525004606.D82941F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-05-26 11:49 ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 13/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add MB_MIN bandwidth allocation via Rbwb Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 14/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add MB_WGHT bandwidth allocation via Mweight Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 15/18] riscv_cbqri: resctrl: Add mbm_total_bytes bandwidth monitoring Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 16/18] ACPI: RISC-V: Parse RISC-V Quality of Service Controller (RQSC) table Drew Fustini
2026-05-25 8:23 ` Sunil V L
2026-05-31 1:51 ` Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 17/18] ACPI: RISC-V: Add support for RISC-V Quality of Service Controller (RQSC) Drew Fustini
2026-05-24 23:55 ` [PATCH RFC v5 18/18] riscv: enable resctrl filesystem for Ssqosid Drew Fustini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahPIKDdzr4SDSaGD@gen8 \
--to=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox