The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:26:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahhlrQ1XO47FusNi@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74a61427-b5d8-41ad-bc5b-508ee246d510@linux.ibm.com>

* Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> [2026-05-28 16:57:54]:

> 
> 
> On 5/25/26 7:37 PM, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
> > Greetings!!!
> > 
> > I am seeing an early boot kernel panic due to NULL pointer dereference
> > on a POWER9 (pSeries) system when testing linux-next (next-20260522).
> > 
> 
> Hi Venkat, Ritesh,
> Could you please try the below diff and see if it helps.
> This helps to fix boot problem for SPLPAR for me.
> 
> Hi Chenyu,
> Let me know if I have to send the patch. Or
> if you want to add more comments or change it feel free to pick it up and send it.
> Either way is fine. Let me know.
> 
> Hi Prateek, Srikar,
> I hope the below diff makes sense. Please check.
> 
> nit: llc_mask is still under CONFIG_SCHED_MC, for ppc it is set to true
> always for SMP systems, and for others it is LLC domain. So not a concern i guess.
> ---
> 
> From 10e9413cef063446d67dc02c2b44e1ea582e5d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 06:16:44 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] topology: Provide arch_llc_mask for cache aware scheduling
> 
> Venkat Reported a boot kernel panic next-20260522. Git bisect pointed to
> b5ea300a17e3 ("sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous")
> 
> Stacktrace points to llc_mask being null.
> 
> NIP [c000000000e58504] _find_first_bit+0x44/0x130
> LR [c000000000e58500] _find_first_bit+0x40/0x130
> Call Trace:
> build_sched_domains+0xad8/0xe50
> sched_init_smp+0xa8/0x164
> kernel_init_freeable+0x250/0x370
> ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
> 
> On powerpc, cpu_coregroup_mask is available only when the underlying
> hardware support coregroup. In shared LPAR, QEMU guest or power9 etc
> coregroup isn;t supported. In such cases llc_mask was being referrenced
> when it was null leading to panic.
> 
> on powerpc, LLC is at SMT core level. So assumption that coregroup(MC)
> domain point to LLC is wrong. Provide a way for archs to say where its
> LLC is if it not at MC domain.
> 
> Fixes: b5ea300a17e3 ("sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous")
> Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/51154de7-3700-4cb4-82f2-1b3a8fa427f7@linux.ibm.com/
> Suggested-by: Chen, Yu C <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h |  3 +++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c           | 10 ++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/topology.c             |  9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> index 66ed5fe1b718..bd1db3b1dbb0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ static inline int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  #include <asm/cputable.h>
> +const struct cpumask *arch_llc_mask(int cpu);
> +#define arch_llc_mask	arch_llc_mask
> +
>  struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu);
>  const struct cpumask *cpu_die_mask(int cpu);
>  int cpu_die_id(int cpu);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 3467f86fd78f..cc8e87d6cae9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1101,6 +1101,16 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_die_mask(int cpu)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_die_mask);
> +const struct cpumask *arch_llc_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> +	/* Power9, CACHE domain is the LLC*/
> +	if (shared_caches)
> +		return cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu);
> +
> +	/* For others, SMT domain is the LLC*/
> +	return cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
> +}

Why dont we do 
#define arch_llc_mask cpu_l2_cache_mask


-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25 14:07 [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-25 15:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-25 16:16   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26  3:14     ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26  3:14   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26  4:08     ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26  4:58       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26  5:53         ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 14:08           ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask Chen Yu
2026-05-27  7:01             ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-27 16:05               ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-27 18:07                 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28  4:58                   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28  9:12                     ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 10:26                       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 15:54                       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 15:58                   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-27 16:30               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26  5:24       ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-27  7:05         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:01           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28  6:54 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 16:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 11:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 13:21   ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 15:06   ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 15:56   ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2026-05-28 16:31     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:44       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-29  3:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-29  6:59   ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ahhlrQ1XO47FusNi@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox