The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] crypto: atmel-ecc - remove stale comments in atmel_ecc_remove
@ 2026-06-02 16:52 Thorsten Blum
  2026-06-11  5:29 ` Herbert Xu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2026-06-02 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thorsten Blum, Herbert Xu, David S. Miller, Nicolas Ferre,
	Alexandre Belloni, Claudiu Beznea
  Cc: linux-crypto, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

atmel_ecc_remove() no longer returns -EBUSY since commit 7df7563b16aa
("crypto: atmel-ecc - Remove duplicated error reporting in .remove()")
and is a void function since commit ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove
callback return void").

Remove and update the outdated comments.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
 drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c b/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
index 9c380351d2f9..e6068dc0a0c1 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
@@ -347,13 +347,11 @@ static void atmel_ecc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct atmel_i2c_client_priv *i2c_priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
-	/* Return EBUSY if i2c client already allocated. */
 	if (atomic_read(&i2c_priv->tfm_count)) {
 		/*
 		 * After we return here, the memory backing the device is freed.
-		 * That happens no matter what the return value of this function
-		 * is because in the Linux device model there is no error
-		 * handling for unbinding a driver.
+		 * That happens because in the Linux device model there is no
+		 * error handling for unbinding a driver.
 		 * If there is still some action pending, it probably involves
 		 * accessing the freed memory.
 		 */

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] crypto: atmel-ecc - remove stale comments in atmel_ecc_remove
  2026-06-02 16:52 [PATCH] crypto: atmel-ecc - remove stale comments in atmel_ecc_remove Thorsten Blum
@ 2026-06-11  5:29 ` Herbert Xu
  2026-06-11 10:55   ` Thorsten Blum
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2026-06-11  5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thorsten Blum
  Cc: David S. Miller, Nicolas Ferre, Alexandre Belloni, Claudiu Beznea,
	linux-crypto, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 06:52:49PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> atmel_ecc_remove() no longer returns -EBUSY since commit 7df7563b16aa
> ("crypto: atmel-ecc - Remove duplicated error reporting in .remove()")
> and is a void function since commit ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove
> callback return void").
> 
> Remove and update the outdated comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c b/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
> index 9c380351d2f9..e6068dc0a0c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
> @@ -347,13 +347,11 @@ static void atmel_ecc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>  	struct atmel_i2c_client_priv *i2c_priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>  
> -	/* Return EBUSY if i2c client already allocated. */
>  	if (atomic_read(&i2c_priv->tfm_count)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * After we return here, the memory backing the device is freed.
> -		 * That happens no matter what the return value of this function
> -		 * is because in the Linux device model there is no error
> -		 * handling for unbinding a driver.
> +		 * That happens because in the Linux device model there is no
> +		 * error handling for unbinding a driver.
>  		 * If there is still some action pending, it probably involves
>  		 * accessing the freed memory.
>  		 */

Please fix this properly rather than fiddling with the comments.

Drivers should always fail gracefully if the hardware disappears.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] crypto: atmel-ecc - remove stale comments in atmel_ecc_remove
  2026-06-11  5:29 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2026-06-11 10:55   ` Thorsten Blum
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2026-06-11 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Herbert Xu
  Cc: David S. Miller, Nicolas Ferre, Alexandre Belloni, Claudiu Beznea,
	linux-crypto, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel

On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 01:29:52PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 06:52:49PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> > atmel_ecc_remove() no longer returns -EBUSY since commit 7df7563b16aa
> > ("crypto: atmel-ecc - Remove duplicated error reporting in .remove()")
> > and is a void function since commit ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove
> > callback return void").
> > 
> > Remove and update the outdated comments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> > ---
> >  drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c b/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
> > index 9c380351d2f9..e6068dc0a0c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
> > @@ -347,13 +347,11 @@ static void atmel_ecc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> >  {
> >  	struct atmel_i2c_client_priv *i2c_priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> >  
> > -	/* Return EBUSY if i2c client already allocated. */
> >  	if (atomic_read(&i2c_priv->tfm_count)) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * After we return here, the memory backing the device is freed.
> > -		 * That happens no matter what the return value of this function
> > -		 * is because in the Linux device model there is no error
> > -		 * handling for unbinding a driver.
> > +		 * That happens because in the Linux device model there is no
> > +		 * error handling for unbinding a driver.
> >  		 * If there is still some action pending, it probably involves
> >  		 * accessing the freed memory.
> >  		 */
> 
> Please fix this properly rather than fiddling with the comments.
> 
> Drivers should always fail gracefully if the hardware disappears.

Yes, I'm working on a fix, but it's not ready yet.

Thanks,
Thorsten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-11 10:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-02 16:52 [PATCH] crypto: atmel-ecc - remove stale comments in atmel_ecc_remove Thorsten Blum
2026-06-11  5:29 ` Herbert Xu
2026-06-11 10:55   ` Thorsten Blum

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox